[Openstack-docs] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/54644/ - ML2 in Install Guide

Diane Fleming diane.fleming at RACKSPACE.COM
Mon Nov 4 18:03:33 UTC 2013


I reverted it (I think successfully) - please check that I actually removed the change to Install Guide.

thanks,

Diane
----------------------------------------------
Diane Fleming
Software Developer II - US
diane.fleming at rackspace.com
Cell  512.323.6799
Office 512.874.1260
Skype drfleming0227
Google-plus diane.fleming at gmail.com

From: Anne Gentle <annegentle at justwriteclick.com<mailto:annegentle at justwriteclick.com>>
Date: Monday, November 4, 2013 11:58 AM
To: Diane Fleming <diane.fleming at rackspace.com<mailto:diane.fleming at rackspace.com>>
Cc: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse.com<mailto:aj at suse.com>>, "openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org>" <openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [Openstack-docs] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/54644/ - ML2 in Install Guide

Ohh. Hm. Yes we were waiting on that one, is there a way to reverse it back out?

As far as getting ml2 in, I'm wondering if we can clean up a certain number of bugs in the install guide, then add that back in, and stop backporting as much? Or pick a date and promise we'll start merging in icehouse-only after that date, such as a month from now? Preferences or other ideas?

My sense is we're not ready to stop backporting so I'm reluctant to merge in the ml2 patch(es) yet.



On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Diane Fleming <diane.fleming at rackspace.com<mailto:diane.fleming at rackspace.com>> wrote:
Oh! I was unaware of the controversy. If you want me to back it out, let
me know.


Diane
----------------------------------------------
Diane Fleming
Software Developer II - US

diane.fleming at rackspace.com<mailto:diane.fleming at rackspace.com>
Cell  512.323.6799<tel:512.323.6799>
Office 512.874.1260<tel:512.874.1260>
Skype drfleming0227
Google-plus diane.fleming at gmail.com<mailto:diane.fleming at gmail.com>






On 11/4/13 11:46 AM, "Andreas Jaeger" <aj at suse.com<mailto:aj at suse.com>> wrote:

>This patch has seen some controversary discussions previously (see
>https://review.openstack.org/#/c/51992/) and was just merged.
>
>I'd like to ask whether it really should stay in the guide as is and
>whether it should be backported.
>
>Andreas
>--
> Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com<http://suse.com>,opensuse.org<http://opensuse.org>} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
>  SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
>   GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg)
>    GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
>
>_______________________________________________
>Openstack-docs mailing list
>Openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org<mailto:Openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org>
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs


_______________________________________________
Openstack-docs mailing list
Openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org<mailto:Openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs



--
Anne Gentle
annegentle at justwriteclick.com<mailto:annegentle at justwriteclick.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20131104/892c5e1e/attachment.html>


More information about the Openstack-docs mailing list