Open Stack

It worked!!

https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+bug/1192017

Regards,

Tom

On 14/06/13 23:09, Lorin Hochstein wrote:
> Yup, sounds good to me (the stopping of the email flood, that is). Have
> any docimpact bugs been auto-filed by this system yet? I haven't noticed
> any so far.
>
> Lorin
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Tom Fifield <tom at openstack.org
> <mailto:tom at openstack.org>> wrote:
>
>     *looks away into the distance*
>
>     https://review.openstack.org/#__/c/32994
>     <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/32994>
>
>     also - we're only going to stop the email flood once we're sure bugs
>     are working, if that's OK ? We don't want to miss any impact :)
>
>
>     Regards,
>
>     Tom
>
>
>     On 14/06/13 01:11, Anne Gentle wrote:
>
>         Hi all,
>
>         Looks like https://review.openstack.org/#__/c/32348/
>         <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/32348/> merged yesterday, so
>         we can consider our mailing list freed up from the DocImpact
>         oppression!
>
>         Thanks Tom and Stephen -
>         Anne
>
>
>         On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Michael Still
>         <michael.still at rackspace.com
>         <mailto:michael.still at rackspace.com>
>         <mailto:michael.still at __rackspace.com
>         <mailto:michael.still at rackspace.com>>> wrote:
>
>              On 12/06/2013, at 6:52 AM, Anne Gentle
>              <annegentle at justwriteclick.com
>         <mailto:annegentle at justwriteclick.com>
>         <mailto:annegentle at __justwriteclick.com
>         <mailto:annegentle at justwriteclick.com>>>
>
>                wrote:
>               >
>               > Absolutely, and at the TC dinner in Portland, Michael
>         Still was
>              saying something very similar, that he'll down vote DocImpact
>              patches that don't have all the configuration information
>         spelled
>              out in the commit message. I don't know how that's going in
>         reality,
>              though. But you are certainly in the right to do so, and it
>         seems
>              very legit from a documentor's perspective that you want
>         more info.
>              CCing Michael in case he has more input on how it's going,
>         asking
>              for info in commit messages.
>
>              I think the reality is that I'm pretty much the only one
>         enforcing
>              this at the moment… It might be worth taking it to the dev
>         list and
>              asking for more of a consensus. I don't think its a big ask or
>              unreasonable -- its just a case of needing to educate people.
>
>              Cheers,
>              Michael
>
>
>
>
>         --
>         Anne Gentle
>         annegentle at justwriteclick.com
>         <mailto:annegentle at justwriteclick.com>
>         <mailto:annegentle at __justwriteclick.com
>         <mailto:annegentle at justwriteclick.com>>
>
>
>
>         _________________________________________________
>         Openstack-docs mailing list
>         Openstack-docs at lists.__openstack.org
>         <mailto:Openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org>
>         http://lists.openstack.org/__cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/__openstack-docs
>         <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs>
>
>
>
>     _________________________________________________
>     Openstack-docs mailing list
>     Openstack-docs at lists.__openstack.org
>     <mailto:Openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org>
>     http://lists.openstack.org/__cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/__openstack-docs
>     <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Lorin Hochstein
> Lead Architect - Cloud Services
> Nimbis Services, Inc.
> www.nimbisservices.com <http://www.nimbisservices.com>