Open Stack

We could tighten the schema to enforce it.

David

Typed wtih thmubs.

-----Original Message-----
From: Summer Long [slong at redhat.com]
Received: Thursday, 25 Jul 2013, 12:27pm
To: openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org [openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org]
Subject: Re: [Openstack-docs] orderedlist vs procedure



On 07/26/2013 08:17 AM, Steve Gordon wrote:

----- Original Message -----


From: "Anne Gentle" <anne at openstack.org><mailto:anne at openstack.org>
To: "Nermina Miller" <nerminamiller at gmail.com><mailto:nerminamiller at gmail.com>
Cc: openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 6:02:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Openstack-docs] orderedlist vs procedure

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Nermina Miller
<nerminamiller at gmail.com><mailto:nerminamiller at gmail.com>wrote:



+1: A great way to distinguish actions from pure lists. Add <step> for
items? - Nermina




Yep, exactly. A <procedure> has a title as well.



That's not something that's actually enforced as part of the schemas, but I would like to see it as part of the conventions as well.

Thanks,

Steve

_______________________________________________
Openstack-docs mailing list
Openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org<mailto:Openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs


+1 :)

thanks,
Summer

Summer Long
OpenStack Documentation
Engineering Content Services

Red Hat Asia Pacific
Brisbane, Australia
slong at redhat.com<mailto:slong at redhat.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20130725/24bead37/attachment.html>