Open Stack

Sorry to jump in on this discussion so late down the thread (on vacation
with limited wifi) but I was the one who made the link in that particular
commit. Should I continue I using links and, if so, what's the best way to
do it without causing trouble? Thanks! - Nermina

On Friday, July 19, 2013, Lorin Hochstein wrote:

>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 8:01 PM, David Cramer <david.cramer at rackspace.com<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'david.cramer at rackspace.com');>
> > wrote:
>
>> On 07/18/2013 05:43 PM, Denis Bradford wrote:
>> > While you're brainstorming, I'm curious why we don't use olinks, since
>> > it's designed to handle cross-document references like this.
>>
>> Funny you should mention that :-) It's next on my list and I've been
>> trying to get to it all summer, but one thing or another keeps coming
>> up. It's still a high priority for me though.
>>
>> As I understand it, olinks would not have changed anything in this case
>> however. The document would have passed the gate job (which effectively
>> would no longer check links at all), but still failed in the maven
>> plugin since the target would be missing.
>>
>> What happened here is the system worked and prevented a mistake by
>> alerting us to a real problem.
>>
>>
> Just to be clear... the system *didn't* work here: docs were committed to
> master that broke the build, and that should never happen. We really need a
> maven job that gate on master to prevent this in the future.
>
> Lorin
>
> --
> Lorin Hochstein
> Lead Architect - Cloud Services
> Nimbis Services, Inc.
> www.nimbisservices.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20130719/aa936b76/attachment.html>