[Openstack-docs] ops guide japanese build fails due to split repositories
Anne Gentle
annegentle at justwriteclick.com
Thu Aug 29 17:18:22 UTC 2013
Looping in Clark Boylan from the Infrastructure team.
Anne
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Ying Chun Guo <guoyingc at cn.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi, Tom and Anne
>
> These scripts are similar with what nova or horizon use to generate their
> pot files,
> like "setup.py" in nova or "./run_tests.sh" in horizon.
>
> So I think there should be a "tools" folder under each documentation
> repository.
> The question is how can we maintain a single version but use them in
> several different repositories.
>
> Do you know how openstack maintain the common folder (Oslo project)?
> I think each openstack project copies it when checking out?
> Or has a script to check out to a specific folder?
>
> Daisy
>
> Tom Fifield <tom at openstack.org> wrote on 2013/08/28 06:22:02:
>
> > Tom Fifield <tom at openstack.org>
> > 2013/08/28 06:22
> >
> > To
> >
> > Anne Gentle <annegentle at justwriteclick.com>,
> >
> > cc
> >
> > "openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org" <openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org
> >
> >
> > Subject
> >
> > Re: [Openstack-docs] ops guide japanese build fails due to split
> repositories
> >
> > On 28/08/13 00:35, Anne Gentle wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Tom Fifield <tom at openstack.org
> > > <mailto:tom at openstack.org <tom at openstack.org>>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Cheers for the look-in :) I agree we should be looking at the
> > > general case ... sorry for the short-sighted bug report!
> > >
> > > Thought about the idea of putting things in openstack-infra/config
> > > too, but discarded it. Essentially, I think we can do this without
> > > putting additional review load on openstack-infra. Having a
> > > bare-bones configuration in openstack-infra/config that points to
> > > scripts in docs-controlled repositories would enable us to be much
> > > more responsive to updates, and means we don't need to bother
> infra :)
> > >
> > > The last few patches I put through to config are took 1-3 weeks to
> > > get through. Importantly, this is completely fine - our patches are
> > > definitely low priority compared to others, and being typically
> less
> > > skilled at the ways of jenkins-job-builder we do want the time
> spent
> > > on thorough review from the overworked infracores.
> > >
> > >
> > > I ask for eyeballs in #openstack-infra if I have a review delay. They
> > > also have a separate Jenkins job review team so for these types of job
> > > additions I think your experience is atypical.
> > >
> > > I've put this patch in: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/43734/ as a
> > > fix. Basically the zuul layout file is running in openstack-manuals and
> > > should run for operations-guide. What I'm unsure of, though, is whether
> > > the same pom.xml is used for non-english output. David or Daisy can you
> > > review?
> >
> > mm. I hadn't realised we're already in this state:
> >
> > > 2) Copy the tools into the openstack-ops repo and perform
> > > the painful
> > > ongoing task of keep them synchronised
> >
> > If that's the decision, then it's an easy-to-fix patch in config.
> > However, I think this state is sub-optimal. I note that the tools
> > directory in operations-guide is already way out of sync with the one in
> > operations-manual, bolstering the claim somewhat :)
> >
> > I also still feel that moving tools into openstack-infra/config is not
> > the solution - and it appears my point above has been missed ... it's
> > not entirely about the timing! It's also about adding to the workload of
> > a busy team, and whose 'job' it is to review what.
> >
> > My advice would be to take a look at what nova, neutron et al do with
> > their 'tools' directories.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Tom
> >
> >
> >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Anne
> > >
> > >
> > > However, this doesn't seem like a tenable situation for the tools,
> > > given the amount of churn we're going through right now (consider
> eg
> > > validate.py!). I think it would seriously slow things down for
> > > something that could potentially be done another way.
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Tom
> > >
> > >
> > > On 25/08/13 01:17, Anne Gentle wrote:
> > >
> > > Is there an option to store the tool in openstack-infra/config
> and
> > > point it at different repos? They're already running scripts
> to send
> > > Horizon strings to transifex. This makes me think so:
> > > https://review.openstack.org/#__/c/32824/3/modules/
> >
> openstack___project/files/jenkins_job___builder/config/translation-__jobs.yaml
> > > <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/32824/3/modules/
> > openstack_project/files/jenkins_job_builder/config/translation-jobs.yaml>
> > >
> > > Plus
> > > https://review.openstack.org/#__/c/34700/3/modules/
> > jenkins/__files/slave_scripts/propose___translation_update_manuals.sh
> > > <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/34700/3/modules/jenkins/
> > files/slave_scripts/propose_translation_update_manuals.sh>
> > > points to a repo and a folder.
> > >
> > > It's from one the original patches Daisy sent through to start
> > > translations. Clark or Jeremy, do you know if a change in the
> config
> > > project would do what's needed -- slice docs from any repo?
> > >
> > > It's important to figure out because the next priority to me
> > > would be
> > > the API quick start in the openstack/api-site repo, then the
> install
> > > guides, so we have at least 3 repos with docs to translate. We
> could
> > > put all the high-priority-to-translate docs in one repo but
> that
> > > seems
> > > too rigid. Let's find a way.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Anne
> > >
> > >
> > > On Aug 23, 2013, at 7:23 PM, Tom Fifield <tom at openstack.org
> > > <mailto:tom at openstack.org <tom at openstack.org>>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Just throwing this bug out there for your comment to select
> > > a way forward:
> > >
> > >
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/__openstack-manuals/+bug/1216153
> > > <https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+bug/1216153
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > The build job for the Japanese version of the Operations
> > > Guide was
> > > merged at: https://review.openstack.org/#__/c/39846/
> > > <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/39846/>
> > >
> > > However, from the first run of the job (logs:
> > > https://jenkins01.openstack.__org/job/openstack-
> > operations-__guide-ja/1/console
> > > <https://jenkins01.openstack.org/job/openstack-
> > operations-guide-ja/1/console>)
> > > it becomes clear that it fails due to the split
> repositories.
> > >
> > > 2013-08-23 23:42:49.457 | cp: cannot stat
> > > `./doc/src/docbkx/openstack-__ops': No such file or
> directory
> > >
> > > To fix this, we either need to:
> > >
> > > 1) Check out the openstack-ops repo into manuals for build
> time
> > >
> > > 2) Copy the tools into the openstack-ops repo and perform
> > > the painful
> > > ongoing task of keep them synchronised
> > >
> > > 3) move openstack-ops back into the openstack-manuals repo
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > >
> > > Tom
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________
> > > Openstack-docs mailing list
> > > Openstack-docs at lists.__openstack.org
> > > <mailto:Openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org<Openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org>
> >
> > > http://lists.openstack.org/__cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
> > __openstack-docs
> > > <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
> > openstack-docs>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Anne Gentle
> > > annegentle at justwriteclick.com <mailto:annegentle at justwriteclick.com<annegentle at justwriteclick.com>
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openstack-docs mailing list
> > Openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs
> >
>
>
--
Anne Gentle
annegentle at justwriteclick.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20130829/77693dc0/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Openstack-docs
mailing list