[manila] Architecture: separation between share and ctl nodes

Jan Wasilewski finarffin at gmail.com
Mon May 22 09:51:57 UTC 2023


Hi Goutham,

Thank you very much for your clarification. I will proceed this way.

Best regards,
/Jan

sob., 20 maj 2023 o 06:08 Goutham Pacha Ravi <gouthampravi at gmail.com>
napisał(a):

> Hi,
>
> Yes; that’s totally fine; we should be clarifying in that doc that that
> limitation applies to using the Generic driver. Your approach should be
> fine for any other external storage systems.
>
> Thanks,
> Goutham
>
> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 9:11 AM Jan Wasilewski <finarffin at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to integrate Manila with our current OpenStack cloud. In the
>> architecture and configuration instructions, it is mentioned that the share
>> node and controller node should be located on separate nodes. However, in
>> our environment, each service is located on a separate VM, so I'm wondering
>> if it would be reasonable to integrate the controller node and share node
>> on a single node.
>>
>> Especially since we are using Huawei Dorado as our backend, and from our
>> tests, we have not observed significant traffic generated by it. Therefore,
>> I would like to know if it is a sensible approach to have everything
>> located on a single node or if we may have missed something important in
>> this integration.
>>
>> Thank you in advance for your insights and advice.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Jan
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20230522/8f003b2c/attachment.htm>


More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list