[manila] Architecture: separation between share and ctl nodes
Goutham Pacha Ravi
gouthampravi at gmail.com
Sat May 20 04:08:20 UTC 2023
Hi,
Yes; that’s totally fine; we should be clarifying in that doc that that
limitation applies to using the Generic driver. Your approach should be
fine for any other external storage systems.
Thanks,
Goutham
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 9:11 AM Jan Wasilewski <finarffin at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to integrate Manila with our current OpenStack cloud. In the
> architecture and configuration instructions, it is mentioned that the share
> node and controller node should be located on separate nodes. However, in
> our environment, each service is located on a separate VM, so I'm wondering
> if it would be reasonable to integrate the controller node and share node
> on a single node.
>
> Especially since we are using Huawei Dorado as our backend, and from our
> tests, we have not observed significant traffic generated by it. Therefore,
> I would like to know if it is a sensible approach to have everything
> located on a single node or if we may have missed something important in
> this integration.
>
> Thank you in advance for your insights and advice.
>
> Best regards,
> Jan
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20230519/9291891d/attachment.htm>
More information about the openstack-discuss
mailing list