Open Stack

Hey Jay,

One other option we could provide is a dedicated room for the discussions
you need others to be involved in that are not physically present. There
should be two of them available.

-Kendall

On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 9:32 AM Jay Faulkner <jay at gr-oss.io> wrote:

> Hey all,
>
> It was brought to my attention that there will not be much opportunity for
> remote participation in the PTG. We would have to manage the A/V ourselves
> in a shared room which would likely be extremely disruptive and ineffective.
>
> So I'm left with a few questions: should we continue forward with a PTG
> session for Ironic in Vancouver? What topics would be suitable with only a
> limited number of core reviewers available?
>
> I propose that the Ironic team uses the PTG venue for an informal
> collaboration and hacking space. It doesn't seem right for us to make any
> in-depth plans with only a subset of the core team.
>
> What do you all think?
>
> --
> Jay Faulkner
> Ironic PTL
> TC Vice-Chair
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20230517/f03d90e8/attachment.htm>