[cinder-backup][ceph] cinder-backup support of incremental backup with ceph backend
Eugen Block
eblock at nde.ag
Wed May 17 13:23:04 UTC 2023
Hi,
just to visualize Rajat's response, ceph creates copy-on-write
snapshots so the incremental backup doesn't really use much space. On
a Victoria cloud I created one full backup of an almost empty volume
(made an ext4 filesystem and mounted it, create one tiny file), then
created a second tiny file and then made another incremental backup,
this is what ceph sees:
ceph01:~ # rbd du <backup_pool>/volume-6662f50a-a74c-47a4-8abd-a49069f3614c
NAME
PROVISIONED USED
volume-6662f50a-a74c-47a4-8abd-a49069f3614c at backup.650a4f8f-7b61-447e-9eb9-767c74b15342.snap.1684329174.8419683 5 GiB 192
MiB
volume-6662f50a-a74c-47a4-8abd-a49069f3614c at backup.1d358548-5d1d-4e03-9728-bb863c717910.snap.1684329450.9599462 5 GiB 16
MiB
volume-6662f50a-a74c-47a4-8abd-a49069f3614c
5 GiB 0 B
<TOTAL>
backup.650a4f8f-7b61-447e-9eb9-767c74b15342 (using 192 MiB) is the
full backup, backup.1d358548-5d1d-4e03-9728-bb863c717910 is the
incremental backup (using 16 MiB).
Zitat von Rajat Dhasmana <rdhasman at redhat.com>:
> Hi Satish,
>
> Did you check the size of the actual backup file in ceph storage? It should
> be created in the *backups* pool[1].
> Cinder shows the same size of incremental backup as a normal backup but
> file size should be different from
> the size shown in cinder DB records. Also file size of incremental backup
> should not be the same as the file size of full backup.
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/openstack/devstack/blob/34afa91fc9f830fc8e1fdc4d76e7aa6d4248eaaa/lib/cinder_backups/ceph#L22
>
> Thanks
> Rajat Dhasmana
>
> On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 12:25 AM Satish Patel <satish.txt at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> I have ceph storage for my openstack and configure cinder-volume and
>> cinder-backup service for my disaster solution. I am trying to use the
>> cinder-backup incremental option to save storage space but somehow It
>> doesn't work the way it should work.
>>
>> Whenever I take incremental backup it shows a similar size of original
>> volume. Technically It should be smaller. Question is does ceph
>> support incremental backup with cinder?
>>
>> I am running a Yoga release.
>>
>> $ openstack volume list
>> +--------------------------------------+------------+------------+------+-------------------------------------+
>> | ID | Name | Status |
>> Size | Attached to |
>> +--------------------------------------+------------+------------+------+-------------------------------------+
>> | 285a49a6-0e03-49e5-abf1-1c1efbfeb5f2 | spatel-vol | backing-up |
>> 10 | Attached to spatel-foo on /dev/sdc |
>> +--------------------------------------+------------+------------+------+-------------------------------------+
>>
>> ### Create full backup
>> $ openstack volume backup create --name spatel-vol-backup spatel-vol --force
>> +-------+--------------------------------------+
>> | Field | Value |
>> +-------+--------------------------------------+
>> | id | 4351d9d3-85fa-4cd5-b21d-619b3385aefc |
>> | name | spatel-vol-backup |
>> +-------+--------------------------------------+
>>
>> ### Create incremental
>> $ openstack volume backup create --name spatel-vol-backup-1
>> --incremental --force spatel-vol
>> +-------+--------------------------------------+
>> | Field | Value |
>> +-------+--------------------------------------+
>> | id | 294b58af-771b-4a9f-bb7b-c37a4f84d678 |
>> | name | spatel-vol-backup-1 |
>> +-------+--------------------------------------+
>>
>> $ openstack volume backup list
>> +--------------------------------------+---------------------+-------------+-----------+------+
>> | ID | Name |
>> Description | Status | Size |
>> +--------------------------------------+---------------------+-------------+-----------+------+
>> | 294b58af-771b-4a9f-bb7b-c37a4f84d678 | spatel-vol-backup-1 | None
>> | available | 10 |
>> | 4351d9d3-85fa-4cd5-b21d-619b3385aefc | spatel-vol-backup | None
>> | available | 10 |
>> +--------------------------------------+---------------------+-------------+-----------+------+
>>
>>
>> My incremental backup still shows 10G size which should be lower
>> compared to the first backup.
>>
>>
>>
More information about the openstack-discuss
mailing list