Open Stack

On 2023-05-16 16:31:50 -0400 (-0400), James Slagle wrote:
[...]
> I feel the wording  "on purpose to prevent..." is a
> mis-characterization of the intent.
[...]

On further discussion in #openstack-tc, it appears some of the
concern was due to the phrase "there should be no more patches
submitted for stable/zed TripleO repos" and the "should" there was
interpreted as implying that the prior contributors were doing this
in order to disallow participation by future contributors who might
want to do so. It seems like this was not actually the intent you
were trying to convey, and was an unfortunate misreading. If you had
said that further patches for that branch are not expected, or that
you personally wouldn't be submitting patches for that branch, I
doubt the reaction would have been so strong.
-- 
Jeremy Stanley
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 963 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20230516/993e0c01/attachment.sig>