Open Stack

Hello Huettner,
I have used the quorum queue since March and it is ok until now. It looks
more stable than the classic queue.  Some feedback to you.
Thank you.
Nguyen Huu Khoi.



On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 1:14 PM Felix Hüttner <felix.huettner at mail.schwarz>
wrote:

> Hi Nguyen,
>
>
>
> we are using quorum queues for one of our deployments. So fare we did not
> have any issue with them. They also seem to survive restarts without issues
> (however reply queues are still broken afterwards in a small amount of
> cases, but they are no quorum/mirrored queues anyway).
>
>
>
> So I would recommend them for everyone that creates a new cluster.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Felix Huettner
>
>
>
> *From:* Nguyễn Hữu Khôi <nguyenhuukhoinw at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Saturday, May 6, 2023 4:29 AM
> *To:* OpenStack Discuss <openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org>
> *Subject:* [OPENSTACK][rabbitmq] using quorum queues
>
>
>
> Hello guys.
>
> IS there any guy who uses the quorum queue for openstack? Could you give
> some feedback to compare with classic queue?
>
> Thank you.
>
> Nguyen Huu Khoi
>
> Diese E Mail enthält möglicherweise vertrauliche Inhalte und ist nur für
> die Verwertung durch den vorgesehenen Empfänger bestimmt.
> Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene Empfänger sein, setzen Sie den Absender
> bitte unverzüglich in Kenntnis und löschen diese E Mail.
>
> Hinweise zum Datenschutz finden Sie hier <https://www.datenschutz.schwarz>
> .
>
>
> This e-mail may contain confidential content and is intended only for the
> specified recipient/s.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please inform the sender
> immediately and delete this e-mail.
>
> Information on data protection can be found here
> <https://www.datenschutz.schwarz>.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20230613/37e1b81b/attachment.htm>