[openstack][largescale-sig] Openstack multi region deployment

Nguyễn Hữu Khôi nguyenhuukhoinw at gmail.com
Mon Jul 24 23:15:30 UTC 2023


Hello Arnaud,
Thank you for sharing.
But how do you deal with db latency, example one region is in Asia and one
is in America.
Nguyen Huu Khoi


On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 7:56 PM Arnaud Morin <arnaud.morin at gmail.com> wrote:

> We have this model also with only one keystone.
> We have multiple galera clusters synchronized together.
> Only one cluster is used for write requests (located in one region),
> others are read only / cache.
> Most of the calls done to our keystone are "read" or token validation
> requests, and this works fine with a read galera cluster / cache.
>
> I know that we also have a custom way to invalidate cache across
> regions, but I dont remember the details, I can ask the team.
>
> Anyway, this is do-able :)
>
> I imagine it also depends on the usage you have, if you create a lot of
> users/projects/assignments, then it may be harder to achieve.
>
> Cheers,
> Arnaud
>
> On 19.07.23 - 14:03, Nguyễn Hữu Khôi wrote:
> > Hello, thank you very much.
> >
> > But can I ask how we process if 1 region at ASIA and  2 regions in the
> USA?
> >
> > Database latency will be our problem.
> >
> > Nguyen Huu Khoi
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 8:21 PM Karl Kloppenborg <
> kkloppenborg at rwts.com.au>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Nguy,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > We’ve deployed a large multi-region openstack deployment.
> > >
> > > As a rule of thumb we’ve got a “keystone” region which is as best we
> can
> > > highly available and very redundant.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > We then have all other regions talk back to this region, we just
> usually
> > > call it “keystone” or “core” and it’s hidden from the UI from users.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > We then just run a large well kept Galara cluster to support it.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --Karl.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > *From: *openstack-discuss-request at lists.openstack.org <
> > > openstack-discuss-request at lists.openstack.org>
> > > *Date: *Tuesday, 18 July 2023 at 9:25 pm
> > > *To: *openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org <
> > > openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org>
> > > *Subject: *openstack-discuss Digest, Vol 57, Issue 55
> > >
> > > Send openstack-discuss mailing list submissions to
> > >         openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org
> > >
> > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > >
> > > https://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-discuss
> > >
> > > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > >         openstack-discuss-request at lists.openstack.org
> > >
> > > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > >         openstack-discuss-owner at lists.openstack.org
> > >
> > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > > than "Re: Contents of openstack-discuss digest..."
> > >
> > >
> > > Today's Topics:
> > >
> > >    1. [openstack][largescale-sig] Openstack multi region deployment
> > >       (Nguy?n H?u Kh?i)
> > >    2. Re: [openstack][largescale-sig] Openstack multi region
> > >       deployment (Felix Huettner)
> > >    3. Re: [openstack][largescale-sig] Openstack multi region
> > >       deployment (Nguy?n H?u Kh?i)
> > >    4. Re: [neutron] unmanaged router resources - OVN interconnect
> > >       (Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez)
> > >
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Message: 1
> > > Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 12:07:12 +0700
> > > From: Nguy?n H?u Kh?i <nguyenhuukhoinw at gmail.com>
> > > To: OpenStack Discuss <openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org>
> > > Subject: [openstack][largescale-sig] Openstack multi region deployment
> > > Message-ID:
> > >         <
> > > CABAODReJ6QW8A4OENEjmhFCiM-15B0qc2La_aMr1EKfaENq9iw at mail.gmail.com>
> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> > >
> > > Hello guys,
> > >
> > > I am going to deploy openstack multi regions and I know that keystone
> > > replication is the most challenging.
> > >
> > > I plan to set up 2 regions which use centralize galera cluster(3
> nodes).
> > > and one standby edge galera cluster(3 nodes)
> > >
> > > When region 1 is node available, I will map region 2 to use standby
> edge
> > > galera cluster.
> > >
> > > I hope  you give me some experience and advice with multi regions.
> > >
> > > Thank you very much.
> > > -------------- next part --------------
> > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > > URL: <
> > >
> https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20230718/c95d3675/attachment-0001.htm
> > > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------
> > >
> > > Message: 2
> > > Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 09:34:35 +0200
> > > From: Felix Huettner <felix.huettner at mail.schwarz>
> > > To: Nguy?n H?u Kh?i <nguyenhuukhoinw at gmail.com>
> > > Cc: OpenStack Discuss <openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org>
> > > Subject: Re: [openstack][largescale-sig] Openstack multi region
> > >         deployment
> > > Message-ID: <ZLZAS-99RzzXfyr8 at SIT-SLAP8639.int.lidl.net>
> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > i think you have two options here:
> > > 1. you could span a single galera cluster over all of your regions.
> > >    this might have some latency issues, but if your are not too write
> > >    heavy that might be fine. I know some companies use that setup.
> > > 2. you use some kind of multiple galera clusters with replication.
> > >    But i have not yet heard of anybody using this setup.
> > >
> > > An alternative might be to have separate keystone setups with separate
> > > databases. This would probably reduce the error potential, but might
> not
> > > fit your usecase.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Felix
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 12:07:12PM +0700, Nguy?n H?u Kh?i wrote:
> > > > Hello guys,
> > > >
> > > > I am going to deploy openstack multi regions and I know that keystone
> > > > replication is the most challenging.
> > > >
> > > > I plan to set up 2 regions which use centralize galera cluster(3
> nodes).
> > > > and one standby edge galera cluster(3 nodes)
> > > >
> > > > When region 1 is node available, I will map region 2 to use standby
> edge
> > > > galera cluster.
> > > >
> > > > I hope  you give me some experience and advice with multi regions.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you very much.
> > > Diese E Mail enth?lt m?glicherweise vertrauliche Inhalte und ist nur
> f?r
> > > die Verwertung durch den vorgesehenen Empf?nger bestimmt.
> > > Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene Empf?nger sein, setzen Sie den
> Absender
> > > bitte unverz?glich in Kenntnis und l?schen diese E Mail.
> > >
> > > Hinweise zum Datenschutz finden Sie hier<
> https://www.datenschutz.schwarz>.
> > >
> > >
> > > This e-mail may contain confidential content and is intended only for
> the
> > > specified recipient/s.
> > > If you are not the intended recipient, please inform the sender
> > > immediately and delete this e-mail.
> > >
> > > Information on data protection can be found here<
> > > https://www.datenschutz.schwarz>.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------
> > >
> > > Message: 3
> > > Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 15:36:11 +0700
> > > From: Nguy?n H?u Kh?i <nguyenhuukhoinw at gmail.com>
> > > To: Nguy?n H?u Kh?i <nguyenhuukhoinw at gmail.com>, OpenStack Discuss
> > >         <openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org>
> > > Subject: Re: [openstack][largescale-sig] Openstack multi region
> > >         deployment
> > > Message-ID:
> > >         <CABAODRcJr=
> > > CGBW1_bRkLQJAxLZxAx8V4qvbdBmTUQBUm2SRsow at mail.gmail.com>
> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> > >
> > > Hi.
> > > Thank you for your reply.
> > >
> > > The first one has a problem because each region is too soft. If a
> member is
> > > down, so this region is gone.
> > >
> > > It is so challenge with us.
> > >
> > >
> > > Nguyen Huu Khoi
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 2:34?PM Felix Huettner
> <felix.huettner at mail.schwarz
> > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > i think you have two options here:
> > > > 1. you could span a single galera cluster over all of your regions.
> > > >    this might have some latency issues, but if your are not too write
> > > >    heavy that might be fine. I know some companies use that setup.
> > > > 2. you use some kind of multiple galera clusters with replication.
> > > >    But i have not yet heard of anybody using this setup.
> > > >
> > > > An alternative might be to have separate keystone setups with
> separate
> > > > databases. This would probably reduce the error potential, but might
> not
> > > > fit your usecase.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Felix
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 12:07:12PM +0700, Nguy?n H?u Kh?i wrote:
> > > > > Hello guys,
> > > > >
> > > > > I am going to deploy openstack multi regions and I know that
> keystone
> > > > > replication is the most challenging.
> > > > >
> > > > > I plan to set up 2 regions which use centralize galera cluster(3
> > > nodes).
> > > > > and one standby edge galera cluster(3 nodes)
> > > > >
> > > > > When region 1 is node available, I will map region 2 to use standby
> > > edge
> > > > > galera cluster.
> > > > >
> > > > > I hope  you give me some experience and advice with multi regions.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you very much.
> > > > Diese E Mail enth?lt m?glicherweise vertrauliche Inhalte und ist nur
> f?r
> > > > die Verwertung durch den vorgesehenen Empf?nger bestimmt.
> > > > Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene Empf?nger sein, setzen Sie den
> Absender
> > > > bitte unverz?glich in Kenntnis und l?schen diese E Mail.
> > > >
> > > > Hinweise zum Datenschutz finden Sie hier<
> https://www.datenschutz.schwarz
> > > >.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > This e-mail may contain confidential content and is intended only
> for the
> > > > specified recipient/s.
> > > > If you are not the intended recipient, please inform the sender
> > > > immediately and delete this e-mail.
> > > >
> > > > Information on data protection can be found here<
> > > > https://www.datenschutz.schwarz>.
> > > >
> > > -------------- next part --------------
> > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > > URL: <
> > >
> https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20230718/749440e3/attachment-0001.htm
> > > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------
> > >
> > > Message: 4
> > > Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 13:23:27 +0200
> > > From: Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez <ralonsoh at redhat.com>
> > > To: Roberto Bartzen Acosta <roberto.acosta at luizalabs.com>
> > > Cc: openstack-discuss <openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org>,  Terry
> > >         Wilson <twilson at redhat.com>, Tiago Pires <
> > > tiago.pires at luizalabs.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [neutron] unmanaged router resources - OVN interconnect
> > > Message-ID:
> > >         <
> > > CAECr9X7U7YsGBv9ajcmeOCxfdD+YLar8QyPwYBN0qaP10CzTug at mail.gmail.com>
> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> > >
> > > Ok, this is being tortuous. First of all: define a strategy. If you are
> > > going to create the resources in Neutron, define how. I've provided a
> way
> > > to do this, find a formal strategy to ground it.
> > >
> > > Second: (again) try to find a connection between resources, if you are
> > > going to use the strategy of creating the resources in Neutron. The
> > > "Logical_Router_Static_Route" belongs to a router univocally. If that
> > > router has been created by OpenStack, then you can modify the DB sync
> > > method to consider learned routes too.
> > >
> > > In order to do this, you'll need a set of resources that are going to
> be
> > > needed in Neutron, the OVN counterparts and other resources (like
> > > "Logical_Router_Static_Route") that will be added and will be present
> in
> > > OVN and not in Neutron DB. Also you'll need to know how to relate all
> of
> > > them.
> > > -------------- next part --------------
> > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > > URL: <
> > >
> https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20230718/90712e47/attachment.htm
> > > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------
> > >
> > > Subject: Digest Footer
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > openstack-discuss mailing list
> > > openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------
> > >
> > > End of openstack-discuss Digest, Vol 57, Issue 55
> > > *************************************************
> > >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20230725/4c9e122f/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list