[cinder][all][tc] Cinder to EOL all EM branches
Jeremy Stanley
fungi at yuggoth.org
Wed Jul 5 20:18:55 UTC 2023
On 2023-07-05 11:14:21 -0700 (-0700), Ghanshyam Mann wrote:
[...]
> Even though we were not able to get any solution to existing EM
> issue and TC is working on that and hopefully we will come to the
> agreement soon (even it might be killing the EM process).
[...]
> IMO, we should wait for overall decision on EM so that we can keep
> consistency to our operator. Whatever the agreement will be, it
> will be same for all projects and give a clear consistency to
> Operators.
[...]
While I appreciate that this decision on the part of the Cinder
contributors puts the overall OpenStack community in a bit of a
quandary, it would be good to let them know how long they're being
asked to wait for official feedback from the TC, so that they can
proceed with their original plan (backed by existing stable
maintenance policy) if the debate continues to drag out. Can the TC
please commit to reaching a conclusion by some specific deadline?
--
Jeremy Stanley
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 963 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20230705/1b0ba85c/attachment.sig>
More information about the openstack-discuss
mailing list