[openstack][cinder] Assign each storage backend to each AZ
Nguyễn Hữu Khôi
nguyenhuukhoinw at gmail.com
Wed Jan 4 16:32:53 UTC 2023
Thanks, I'll check them out.
On Wed, Jan 4, 2023, 8:51 PM Alan Bishop <abishop at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 1:09 AM Sa Pham <saphi070 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> You have to run cinder-volume service for each AZ. And in your
>> configuration of cinder-volume you need to specify
>> storage_availability_zone for that zone.
>>
>
> Alternatively, you can run a single cinder-volume service with multiple
> backends, and use the backend_availability_zone option [1] to specify each
> backend's AZ. The backend_availability_zone overrides the
> storage_availability_zone for that backend.
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/openstack/cinder/blob/d55a004e524f752c228a4a7bda5d24d4223325de/cinder/volume/driver.py#L239
>
> Alan
>
>
>> With nova-compute, you have to create a host aggregate with an
>> availability zone option for these compute nodes.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 3:42 PM Nguyễn Hữu Khôi <nguyenhuukhoinw at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, thanks for the clarification. :)
>>> Nguyen Huu Khoi
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 3:03 PM Rajat Dhasmana <rdhasman at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 1:01 PM Nguyễn Hữu Khôi <
>>>> nguyenhuukhoinw at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the answer.
>>>>> But I cannot find the way to configure the storage backend per AZ,
>>>>> Would you give me some suggestions?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It totally depends on the deployment method you're using. It could be
>>>> either tripleo, ansible etc and every deployment method should provide a
>>>> way to set an availability zone for a volume backend. I'm not a deployment
>>>> expert but a specific deployment team needs to be consulted for the same.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Nguyen Huu Khoi
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 1:53 PM Rajat Dhasmana <rdhasman at redhat.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From the description, I'm assuming the instances will be boot from
>>>>>> volume. In that case, you will need to create a volume type for each
>>>>>> backend and you can use 'extra_specs' properties in the volume type to
>>>>>> assign a volume type to a particular AZ. In this case, if you're already
>>>>>> creating one backend per AZ then a volume type linked to that backend
>>>>>> should be good.
>>>>>> Now you will need to create a bootable volume and launch an instance
>>>>>> with it. Again, the instance should be launched in the AZ as used in the
>>>>>> volume type to support your use case.
>>>>>> Also if you want to restrict volumes of a particular AZ to be
>>>>>> attached to the instance of the same AZ, you can use the config option
>>>>>> *cross_az_attach*[1] which will allow/disallow cross AZ attachments.
>>>>>> Hope that helps.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>> https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/configuration/config.html#cinder.cross_az_attach
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> Rajat Dhasmana
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 7:31 AM Nguyễn Hữu Khôi <
>>>>>> nguyenhuukhoinw at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello guys.
>>>>>>> I took time to search for this question but I can't find the answer.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have an Openstack private cloud and I use an AZ to a department.
>>>>>>> For example,
>>>>>>> AZ-IT for IT department
>>>>>>> AZ-Sale for Sale department...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I will prepare 2 storage backends for each AZ.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My goal is that when users launch an instance by choosing AZ then It
>>>>>>> will use only the backend for this AZ.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Would Openstack support my goal?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for reading my email.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nguyen Huu Khoi
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>
>> --
>> Sa Pham Dang
>> Skype: great_bn
>> Phone/Telegram: 0986.849.582
>>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20230104/0b9dbe84/attachment.htm>
More information about the openstack-discuss
mailing list