Open Stack

I don't think it has been said in the 2 threads, so I'd like to highlight
that uwsgi is not (yet?) an abandonware. The two maintainers promised to
keep it afloat. It means that we don't really need to jump the ship
immediately, especially if we're not sure about the alternatives. If they
keep updating uwsgi for new Pythons and fixing CVEs, we may be just fine.

Dmitry

On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 5:19 PM Takashi Kajinami <tkajinam at redhat.com>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
>
> I happened to notice that uwsgi announced it's now in maintenance mode.
> https://github.com/unbit/uwsgi/blame/master/README#L5
>
> Is anybody aware of this ?
>
> The README file says they will still maintain the repo for bug fixes and
> new python version support.
> This is nice but is not a good sign, and can be concerning for us because
> we have been using uwsgi
> in devstack since we selected it as our default stack when we implemented
> the community goal
> to support wsgi framework[1].
>
> [1]
> https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/completed/pike/deploy-api-in-wsgi.html
>
> This might be a topic we should discuss in the upcoming PTG further, but
> I'd like to share this earlier
> to make everyone aware of this announcement.
>
> I'm very happy to be corrected if I'm looking at something wrong ...
>
> Thank you,
> Takashi Kajinami
>


-- 

Red Hat GmbH <https://www.redhat.com/de/global/dach>, Registered seat:
Werner von Siemens Ring 12, D-85630 Grasbrunn, Germany
Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen/Munich, HRB 153243,Managing
Directors: Ryan Barnhart, Charles Cachera, Michael O'Neill, Amy Ross
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20230227/2f33a3e0/attachment.htm>