Open Stack

Hi,

Updating cinder status here.
We discussed this in the cinder meeting yesterday[1] and there were no
objections from the team to keep rocky and stein branches in EM.
So cinder is +1 on moving rocky and stein branches to EOL.

[1]
https://meetings.opendev.org/irclogs/%23openstack-meeting-alt/%23openstack-meeting-alt.2023-02-01.log.html#t2023-02-01T14:42:34

Thanks
Rajat Dhasmana

On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 10:18 AM Rajat Dhasmana <rdhasman at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi Elod,
>
> The last commits done in rocky[1] and stein[2] were on Sep 17, 2021. Since
> then we also discovered that one of the job definition, nova-multiattach[3]
> was removed in nova rocky release and since nova EOLed their rocky
> branch[4], that job is breaking (although I haven't confirmed with WIP
> patches but the last commit in September 2021 passed that job[5] and the
> gate breaking was noticed recently with change[6]).
>
> We will discuss this in the cinder upstream meeting this week and will
> update this thread but I'm currently in favor of moving cinder rocky and
> stein branches to EOL.
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/openstack/cinder/commit/cdcf7b5f8b3c850555942f422b8ad1f43e21fe7b
> [2]
> https://github.com/openstack/cinder/commit/667c6da08d423888f1df85d639fef058553f6169
> [3] https://github.com/openstack/cinder/blob/stable/rocky/.zuul.yaml#L153
> [4] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/862520
> [5]
> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/809657/1#message-50e6adf07ba3883a74f6e9939d34f0f0f0fe8d7a
> [6]
> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/871799/3#message-439428e2a146adc233e1a894a7a85004f3f920e4
>
> Thanks
> Rajat Dhasmana
>
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 11:38 PM Elõd Illés <elod.illes at est.tech> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Similarly like the Queens branch EOL proposal [1] I would like to propose
>> to transition every project's stable/rocky to End of Life:
>>
>> - gates are mostly broken
>> - minimal number of activity can be seen on this branch
>> - some core projects already transitioned their stable/rocky to EOL
>>   recently (like ironic, neutron, nova)
>> - gate job definitions are still using the old, legacy zuul syntax
>> - gate jobs are based on Ubuntu Xenial, which is also beyond its public
>>   maintenance window date and hard to maintain
>>
>> Based on the above, if there won't be any project who wants to keep open
>> their stable/rocky, then I'll start the process of EOL'ing Rocky stable
>> series as a whole. If anyone has any objection then please respond to
>> this mail.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Előd Illés
>> irc: elodilles @ #openstack-stable / #openstack-release
>>
>> [1]
>> https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-October/031030.html
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20230202/41e78d5e/attachment-0001.htm>