[magnum][heat][requirements][release] Potential blocker for release with python-magnumclient 4.0.0
Tony Breeds
tony at bakeyournoodle.com
Fri Sep 23 07:29:45 UTC 2022
Hi all,
Thanks to the heat team they quickly resolved the problem and the
release and requirements teams can/have moved forward.
#thanks
On Wed, 21 Sept 2022 at 15:57, Tony Breeds <tony at bakeyournoodle.com> wrote:
> Okay cool. I'll take a punt at removing it
>
> On Wed, 21 Sept 2022 at 15:50, Brendan Shephard <bshephar at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hey Tony,
>>
>> Thanks for the heads up. We have deprecated support for these resources
>> some time ago:
>> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/heat/+/433549
>>
>> I don't believe there are any concerns with removing this resource and
>> subsequent use of the baymodel API from Heat now.
>>
>> Brendan Shephard
>>
>> Senior Software Engineer
>>
>> Red Hat APAC <https://www.redhat.com>
>>
>> 193 N Quay
>>
>> Brisbane City QLD 4000
>> @RedHat <https://twitter.com/redhat> Red Hat
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/red-hat> Red Hat
>> <https://www.facebook.com/RedHatInc>
>> <https://red.ht/sig>
>> <https://redhat.com/summit>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 3:37 PM Tony Breeds <tony at bakeyournoodle.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello all,
>>> In [1] baymodel code was removed, although it still seems to be
>>> listed in the API-ref. Story [2] states it's been deprecated for a
>>> long time, but a quick check failed to see this documented anywhere.
>>> Heat still supports baymodel and the removal is causing failures.
>>> Blocking the use of python-magnumclient 4.0.0[3] inzed, even though
>>> the 4.0.0 release is clearly meant for zed.
>>>
>>> I can see a couple of paths forward.
>>>
>>> 0. Remove the documentation in the api-ref for baymodels
>>> 1. Remove the support in heat for baymodels (I think the newer
>>> clusters API can be used instead?)
>>> 2. Revert the change in magnumclient and re-release etc etc
>>> 3. Keep 4.0.0 for the Antelope release, and reset the stable/zed
>>> branch python-magnumclient to fd0cb1e (before the removal of
>>> baymodels)
>>>
>>> Obviously option 1 looks like the least disruptive change, but
>>> potentially causes a problem for heat depending on the published state
>>> of baymodel support
>>>
>>> [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-magnumclient/+/803629
>>> [2] https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2009104
>>> [3] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/858089
>>>
>>> --
>>> Yours Tony.
>>>
>>>
>
> --
> Yours Tony.
>
--
Yours Tony.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20220923/0f17f3f0/attachment.htm>
More information about the openstack-discuss
mailing list