[neutron][neutron-vpnaas] neutron-tempest-plugin coverage

Lajos Katona katonalala at gmail.com
Tue May 24 08:14:36 UTC 2022

Basically I am fine with it, I will bring this topic to the meeting today.

Mohammed Naser <mnaser at vexxhost.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2022. máj. 23., H,

> Hiya,
> As part of cleaning up VPNaaS, I decided to explore fixing the
> longstanding failures of the
> `neutron-tempest-plugin-vpnaas-libreswan-centos` job that was always
> failing and non-voting.
> Upon trying to flip the switch on it in a test change[1], I noticed
> that much of the test results seem to be simply exercising the API[2],
> essentially making the fact that we run that job on CentOS a bit
> redundant.
> The tests that actually exercise more than the API and validate
> connectivity are the functional tests, which currently run for
> "StrongSwan" only on Ubuntu.  My question to the Neutron team is:
> 1. Should we get rid of the functional jobs and move them into
> neutron-tempest-plugin, and run that for different platforms?
> 2. Should we get rid of the neutron-tempest-plugin job under CentOS
> and add functional jobs for CentOS?
> My inclination seems to be #2, since that is what other stadium
> projects seem to be doing (no one seems to run platform-specific
> neutron-tempest-plugin jobs). It also keeps maintainability simpler
> since it remains in the hands of the VPNaaS team.
> Thanks
> Mohammed
> [1]: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/+/843005
> [2]:
> https://storage.bhs.cloud.ovh.net/v1/AUTH_dcaab5e32b234d56b626f72581e3644c/zuul_opendev_logs_cd1/843005/2/check/neutron-tempest-plugin-vpnaas-libreswan-centos/cd1ac04/testr_results.html
> --
> Mohammed Naser
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20220524/43aaffd8/attachment-0001.htm>

More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list