[neutron][neutron-vpnaas] neutron-tempest-plugin coverage
katonalala at gmail.com
Tue May 24 08:14:36 UTC 2022
Basically I am fine with it, I will bring this topic to the meeting today.
Mohammed Naser <mnaser at vexxhost.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2022. máj. 23., H,
> As part of cleaning up VPNaaS, I decided to explore fixing the
> longstanding failures of the
> `neutron-tempest-plugin-vpnaas-libreswan-centos` job that was always
> failing and non-voting.
> Upon trying to flip the switch on it in a test change, I noticed
> that much of the test results seem to be simply exercising the API,
> essentially making the fact that we run that job on CentOS a bit
> The tests that actually exercise more than the API and validate
> connectivity are the functional tests, which currently run for
> "StrongSwan" only on Ubuntu. My question to the Neutron team is:
> 1. Should we get rid of the functional jobs and move them into
> neutron-tempest-plugin, and run that for different platforms?
> 2. Should we get rid of the neutron-tempest-plugin job under CentOS
> and add functional jobs for CentOS?
> My inclination seems to be #2, since that is what other stadium
> projects seem to be doing (no one seems to run platform-specific
> neutron-tempest-plugin jobs). It also keeps maintainability simpler
> since it remains in the hands of the VPNaaS team.
> : https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/+/843005
> Mohammed Naser
> VEXXHOST, Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the openstack-discuss