[ironic] Thoughts on closing some branches
Arne.Wiebalck at cern.ch
Arne.Wiebalck at cern.ch
Tue Jun 28 08:44:45 UTC 2022
Sounds good to me as well.
Thanks, Iury!
> On 06/28/2022 10:27 AM Riccardo Pittau <elfosardo at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> All good for both points, thanks Iury!
>
>
>
> Ciao,
> Riccardo
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 3:19 PM Iury Gregory <iurygregory at gmail.com <mailto:iurygregory at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Ironicers o/
> >
> >
> > I would like to gather some feedback before moving forward with the oficial request to close some branches.
> >
> >
> > 1) Closing some bugfix branches
> > I would like to check if we are ok with closing all other bugfix branches except for:
> > ironic: bugfix/20.2 | bugfix/19.0 | bugfix/18.1
> > ironic-python-agent: bugfix/8.6 | bugfix/8.3 | bugfix/8.1
> >
> > ironic-inspector: bugfix/10.12 | bugfix/10.9 | bugfix/10.7
> >
> >
> >
> > These are the branches I know people use, but it's good to double check before removing all other bugfix/*.
> >
> >
> > The reason to close is because it became a bit more complicated to maintain CI working properly in those branches, so if we don't have people using and looking at backports and making CI work I think we can close them.
> >
> >
> >
> > 2) Closing all stable branches pre-train.
> >
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Att[]'s
> > Iury Gregory Melo Ferreira
> > MSc in Computer Science at UFCG
> >
> > Ironic PTL
> > Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat Brazil
> > Social: https://www.linkedin.com/in/iurygregory <https://www.linkedin.com/in/iurygregory>
> > E-mail: iurygregory at gmail.com <mailto:iurygregory at gmail.com> >
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20220628/4e9aa8ab/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the openstack-discuss
mailing list