Open Stack

Thank you for the clarification.
So I should let the handling of redundancy to keepalive and haproxy instead
of using external tools.

On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 at 15:21, Sean Mooney <smooney at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 2022-07-19 at 13:51 +0100, A Monster wrote:
> > I've deployed openstack xena using *kolla-ansible* on *centos 8 stream*,
> > I've used multiple controller nodes, a bunch of compute nodes and a
> storage
> > cluster.
> > Controller nodes include network services.
> >
> > I want to know how can I successfully set up redundancy between these
> > controller nodes, in a way that some nodes are active while others are on
> > standby state, and would only become active in case when the active nodes
> > are to fail.
> in generall that is not needed with openstack.
>
> most service are partly or mostly stateless using the db to store any
> relevent persitent state.
>
> that generally menas that for example you can have n nova api process
> active at any time and
> you do not need to use external managment fo the serivce to have some be
> active and other be passive.
>
> in general such active/standby configurtation is an antipatter and should
> not need to be done with openstack.
>
> in kolla keepalived and haproxe shoudl migrate the contol plane vips and
> include/exclude donw services automaiticaly.
>
> if you want to manually take over that function its likely possibel but
> not how HA is intended to work in general.
>
> i dont work on kolla anymore so perhapse there perspectiive has change but
> in generaly i would advocat for active active
> ha in preference ot active standby.
> >
> > Thank you. Regards
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20220719/7ecea28d/attachment-0001.htm>