Open Stack

Hi,

On czwartek, 24 lutego 2022 22:39:57 CET Ghanshyam Mann wrote:
>  ---- On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 15:05:00 -0600 Jeremy Stanley <fungi at yuggoth.org>
> wrote ----
>  > On 2022-02-24 15:00:17 -0600 (-0600), Ghanshyam Mann wrote:
>  > > On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 2:49 PM Jeremy Stanley <fungi at yuggoth.org> 
wrote:
>  > [...]
>  > 
>  > > > I'd like to clean them up by removing their list configurations, but
>  > > > leaving any public archives intact. Are there any objections? Should
>  > > > any of the above have future messages redirected to a different list
>  > > > (though since they haven't had any for years, that's probably
>  > > > unnecessary)?
>  > > 
>  > > +1, and we are dying those are merged in openstack-discuss ML right? If
>  > > anyone using those ML can send email to openstack-discuss.
>  > 
>  > Sorry, that's what I was asking in the quoted paragraph. By default,
>  > any messages to those addresses would just be rejected. We can
>  > direct them to an active mailing list, though I'm not sure that's
>  > warranted since nobody seems to have sent anything to them for 3
>  > years or more.
> 
> I think you are right, as they have not been used for 3 years, nobody will
> use them in future or people aware of openstack-discuss ML. I agree on just
> letting them go.
> 
> -gmann

+1. If those lists were not used for so long, I don't think they will be used 
in the future by anyone.

-- 
Slawek Kaplonski
Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20220225/0d64e944/attachment.sig>