[all][tc] Relmgt team position on release cadence
Ghanshyam Mann
gmann at ghanshyammann.com
Tue Feb 1 22:14:37 UTC 2022
---- On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 19:47:16 -0600 Ghanshyam Mann <gmann at ghanshyammann.com> wrote ----
> ---- On Wed, 01 Dec 2021 16:43:32 -0600 Jean-Philippe Evrard <openstack at a.spamming.party> wrote ----
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 30, 2021, at 23:31, Julia Kreger wrote:
> > >> > It feels like this is a giant "no win situation",
> > > It feels like we have created a bunch of basically immovable,
> > > insurmountable conflicting obstacles. Kind of like a self digging
> > > holes. I'm worried not even hacker-Kirk can save us. Well, maybe his
> > > answer might actually be to abolish the integrated release so he can
> > > not only rescue the operators on the ship, but also beam them the
> > > tools they need to move forward. Granted, that is change, and human
> > > nature is a thing. :(
> >
> > Well, I feel completely differently.
> > For me, people are using different words, and are in agreement in some points.
> > Or maybe I am reading this wrong?
> >
> > Here is what I read:
> > 1) Many want more releases, not less. I haven't seen a complaint about tagging more releases.
> > 2) More than one person is proposing to abandon the integrated release, and nobody has complained about it.
> > 3) Many people seem eager to carry "stable branches" for "critical patches", but no new definition of such criticality was done.
> > 4) Many people want to make sure it's easy to upgrade, and with less steps for operations.
> >
> > I don't see any conflicts, just areas for improvement, for those who have been participating on this topic.
> >
> > Can someone clarify if I have tunnel vision/bias (as it seems exactly what I proposed in my first answer)?
> >
>
> TC is planning to discuss this topic on 3rd Feb 16:00 UTC, let us know if the time works fine. Accordingly,
> I will send the joining link.
I might not be available this week, we will schedule this meeting next week or so.
-gmann
>
> -gmann
>
> > Thank you in advance.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jean-Philippe Evrard (evrardjp)
> >
> >
>
>
More information about the openstack-discuss
mailing list