Hello, I am curious about the choice of providing only a rocky-container element in DIB, which works differently to the centos element, which uses cloud images. It makes it hard to produce working images for VMs or bare metal, as various packages that would normally be installed are missing, such as cloud-utils-growpart or openssh-server. See the kickstarts for reference [1] [2]. It seems to also occasionally cause complex failures such as the one that rendered Rocky Linux 8 images unbootable last week [3]. I am guessing this wouldn't have happened had the build been from a cloud image. Would the DIB community be open to also have a rocky element using GenericCloud images, like centos? Thanks, Pierre Riteau (priteau) [1] https://git.rockylinux.org/rocky/kickstarts/-/blob/r8/Rocky-8-Container-Base.ks [2] https://git.rockylinux.org/rocky/kickstarts/-/blob/r8/Rocky-8-GenericCloud.ks [3] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/diskimage-builder/+/851687 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20220801/45117c52/attachment.htm>