[puppet] Propose retiring puppet-freezer
tkajinam at redhat.com
Tue Sep 14 09:00:57 UTC 2021
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 12:10 AM Thomas Goirand <zigo at debian.org> wrote:
> On 9/6/21 4:53 PM, Takashi Kajinami wrote:
> > Hello,
> > Today I looked into the current code of puppet-freezer and noticed
> > this module is still very incomplete.
> > Most of its implementations are inherited from the cookiecutter template,
> > and the module doesn't support fundamental resources like packages,
> > services and so on.
> > Because we haven't seen any interest in fixing that feature gap for a
> > long time,
> > I'll propose retiring the module during this cycle.
> > Please let me know if you have any concerns. If I don't hear any
> > I'll submit a series of patches to retire the module.
> > Thank you,
> > Takashi Kajinami
> I may have, in a distant future, some interest for it. However, retiring
> it is probably the best thing to do: I can revert the retirement later
> on if I decide to go ahead and maintain it.
> Thomas Goirand (zigo)
Thanks for the feedback.
We can revert the retirement when you (or anybody else) start working on it.
The sad fact is that this module has never been completed for the past 4
and it'd be reasonable to retire the module now instead of keeping the
incomplete implementation any longer.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the openstack-discuss