Open Stack

Hi,

On poniedziałek, 4 października 2021 20:46:29 CEST feilong wrote:
> Hi Herve,
> 
> Please correct me, does that mean we have to also EOL stable/queens and
> stable/rocky for most of the other projects technically? Or it should be
> OK? Thanks.

I don't think we have to. I think it's not that common that we are using new 
versions of oslo libs in those stable branches so IMHO if all works fine for 
some project and it has maintainers, it still can be in EM phase.
Or is my understanding wrong here?

> 
> On 5/10/21 5:09 am, Herve Beraud wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On our last meeting of the oslo team we discussed the problem with
> > broken stable
> > branches (rocky and older) in oslo's projects [1].
> > 
> > Indeed, almost all these branches are broken. Előd Illés kindly
> > generated a list of periodic-stable errors on Oslo's stable branches [2].
> > 
> > Given the lack of active maintainers on Oslo and given the current
> > status of the CI in those branches, I propose to make them End Of Life.
> > 
> > I will wait until the end of month for anyone who would like to maybe
> > step up
> > as maintainer of those branches and who would at least try to fix CI
> > of them.
> > 
> > If no one will volunteer for that, I'll EOLing those branches for all
> > the projects under the oslo umbrella.
> > 
> > Let us know your thoughts.
> > 
> > Thank you for your attention.
> > 
> > [1]
> > https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/oslo/2021/oslo.
2021-10-04-15.00.log.tx
> > t
> > [2]
> > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-July/
023939.html


-- 
Slawek Kaplonski
Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20211004/20278442/attachment.sig>