Open Stack

 ---- On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 09:39:56 -0600 Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com> wrote ----
 > 
 > 
 > On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 2:06 PM Ghanshyam Mann <gmann at ghanshyammann.com> wrote:
 >  ---- On Tue, 09 Nov 2021 19:36:00 -0600 Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com> wrote ----
 >  > On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 12:43 PM Jeremy Stanley <fungi at yuggoth.org> wrote:
 >  > [...] 
 >  > This was based on experiences trying to work with the Kata
 >  > community, and the "experiment" referenced in that mailing list post
 >  > eventually concluded with the removal of remaining Kata project
 >  > configuration when https://review.opendev.org/744687 merged
 >  > approximately 15 months ago.
 >  > 
 >  > ack
 >  > I haven't seen much pushback from moving to Gerrit, but pretty much all feedback I got was from folks who worked (is working) on OpenStack, so a bit biased in my opinion (myself included).Beside that, if we would move to opendev, I want to see some incentives in our roadmap, not just "move our project here because it's cool".
 >  > Some ideas:* Consider it as a subproject from OpenStack SDK? Or part of a SIG?* CI coverage for API regression testing (e.g. gophercloud/acceptance/compute running in Nova CI)* Getting more exposure of the project and potentially more contributors* Consolidate the best practices in general, for contributions to the project, getting started, dev environments, improving CI jobs (current jobs use OpenLab zuul, with a fork of zuul jobs).
 >  > Is there any concern would we have to discuss?-- 
 > 
 > 
 > +1, Thanks Emilien for putting the roadmap which is more clear to understand the logn term benefits. 
 > 
 > Looks good to me, especially CI part is cool to have from API testing perspective and to know where
 > we break things (we run client jobs in many projects CI so it should not be something special we need to do)
 > 
 > >* Consider it as a subproject from OpenStack SDK? Or part of a SIG?
 > 
 > Just to be more clear on this. Does this mean, once we setup the things in opendev then we can migrate it under
 > openstack/ namespace under OpenStack SDK umbrella? or you mean keep it in opendev with non-openstack
 > namespace but collaborative effort with SDK team.
 > 
 > I think we would move the project under opendev with a non openstack namespace, and of course collaborate with everyone. 
 
Thanks for the clarification. +1, sounds like a good plan.

-gmann

> 
 > -- 
 > Emilien Macchi
 >