[all][tc] Relmgt team position on release cadence

Jeremy Stanley fungi at yuggoth.org
Fri Nov 5 16:18:31 UTC 2021


On 2021-11-05 11:53:25 -0400 (-0400), Mohammed Naser wrote:
[...]
> I wonder what are the thoughts of the community of having LTS +
> normal releases so that we can have the power of both?  I guess
> that is essentially what we have with EM, but I guess we could
> introduce a way to ensure that operators can just upgrade LTS to
> LTS.
> 
> It can complicate things a bit from a CI and project management
> side, but I think it could solve the problem for both sides that
> need want new features + those who want stability?

This is really just another way of suggesting we solve the
skip-level upgrades problem, since we can't really test fast-forward
upgrades through so-called "non-LTS" versions once we abandon them.
-- 
Jeremy Stanley
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 963 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20211105/04390d20/attachment.sig>


More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list