Open Stack

Hi,

Dnia środa, 5 maja 2021 20:35:48 CEST Előd Illés pisze:
> Hi,
> 
> Ocata is unfortunately unmaintained for a long time as some general test
> jobs are broken there, so as a stable-maint-core member I support to tag
> neutron's stable/ocata as End of Life. After the branch is tagged,
> please ping me and I can arrange the deletion of the branch.
> 
> For Pike, I volunteered at the PTG in 2020 to help with reviews there, I
> still keep that offer, however I am clearly not enough to keep it
> maintained, besides backports are not arriving for stable/pike in
> neutron. Anyway, if the gate is functional there, then I say we could
> keep it open (but as far as I see how gate situation is worsen now, as
> more and more things go wrong, I don't expect that will take long). If
> not, then I only ask that let's do the EOL'ing first with Ocata and when
> it is done, then continue with neutron's stable/pike.
> 
> For the process please follow the steps here:
> https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/stable-branches.html#end-of-life
> (with the only exception, that in the last step, instead of infra team,
> please turn to me/release team - patch for the documentation change is
> on the way:
> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-team-guide/+/789932 )

Thx. I just proposed patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/790904[1] 
to make ocata-eol in all neutron projects.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Előd
> 
> On 2021. 05. 05. 16:13, Slawek Kaplonski wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > 
> > I checked today that stable/ocata and stable/pike branches in both
> > Neutron and neutron stadium projects are pretty inactive since long time.
> > 
> > * according to [1], last patch merged patch in Neutron for stable/pike
> > was in July 2020 and in ocata October 2019,
> > 
> > * for stadium projects, according to [2] it was September 2020.
> > 
> > 
> > According to [3] and [4] there are no opened patches for any of those
> > branches for Neutron and any stadium project except neutron-lbaas.
> > 
> > 
> > So based on that info I want to propose that we will close both those
> > branches are EOL now and before doing that, I would like to know if
> > anyone would like to keep those branches to be open still.
> > 
> > 
> > [1]
> > https://review.opendev.org/q/project:%255Eopenstack/neutron+(branch:stable/
ocata+OR+branch:stable/pike)+status:merged
> > <https://review.opendev.org/q/project:%255Eopenstack/neutron+(branch:stable/
ocata+OR+branch:stable/pike)+status:merged>
> > 
> > [2]
> > https://review.opendev.org/q/(project:openstack/ovsdbapp+OR+project:openstack/os-ken+OR+project:%255Eopenstack/neutron-.*+OR+project:%255Eopenstack/networki
> > ng-.*)+(branch:stable/ocata+OR+branch:stable/pike)+status:merged
> > <https://review.opendev.org/q/(project:openstack/ovsdbapp+OR+project:openstack/
os-ken+OR+project:%255Eopenstack/neutron-.*+OR+project:%255Eopenstack/networ
> > king-.*)+(branch:stable/ocata+OR+branch:stable/pike)+status:merged>
> > 
> > [3]
> > https://review.opendev.org/q/project:%255Eopenstack/neutron+(branch:stable/
ocata+OR+branch:stable/pike)+status:open
> > <https://review.opendev.org/q/project:%255Eopenstack/neutron+(branch:stable/
ocata+OR+branch:stable/pike)+status:open>
> > 
> > [4]
> > https://review.opendev.org/q/(project:openstack/ovsdbapp+OR+project:openstack/os-ken+OR+project:%255Eopenstack/neutron-.*+OR+project:%255Eopenstack/networki
> > ng-.*)+(branch:stable/ocata+OR+branch:stable/pike)+status:open
> > <https://review.opendev.org/q/(project:openstack/ovsdbapp+OR+project:openstack/
os-ken+OR+project:%255Eopenstack/neutron-.*+OR+project:%255Eopenstack/networ
> > king-.*)+(branch:stable/ocata+OR+branch:stable/pike)+status:open>
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > 
> > Slawek Kaplonski
> > 
> > Principal Software Engineer
> > 
> > Red Hat


-- 
Slawek Kaplonski
Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat

--------
[1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/790904
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20210512/012f52b3/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20210512/012f52b3/attachment.sig>