[ironic] IPA image does not want to boot with UEFI
Vuk Gojnic
vuk.gojnic at gmail.com
Mon May 10 18:43:23 UTC 2021
I finally got some error messages. Mars Toktonaliev suggested following:
"You could also change virtual serial port in BIOS to be COM1, and
then try to SSH to iLO, run VSP command and monitor serial port
output: chances are high that any errors will be dumped there."
I did that and following happens:
1. I get to Grub
2. I load the kernel with "linux /vmlinuz nofb nomodeset vga=normal
console=tty0 console=ttyS0,115200n8"
3. I try to load initrd. It blocks in the loop that throws following
error in the loop (all in red letters - I suspect it is where red
cursor is comming from :D ):
X64 Exception Type 0x03 - Breakpoint Exception
RCX=00000000454F9110 DX=0000000000000020 R8=000000006FA6E168 R9=0000000000000000
RSP=00000000454F92D8 BP=000000003D2E4B40 AX=00000000D176B0E2 BX=000000003F3855C0
R10=FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF 11=000000003D2E5080 12=000000003D2E4FC0 13=000000003D2E4B00
R14=0000000000020004 15=000000006FA677FE SI=00000000000000FF DI=000000003D2E4BE0
CR2=0000000000000000 CR3=00000000454FA000 CR0=80000013 CR4=00000668 CR8=00000000
CS=00000038 DS=00000030 SS=00000030 ES=00000030 RFLAGS=00200297
MSR: 0x1D9 = 00004801, 0x345=000033C5, 0x1C9=00000001
LBRs From To From To
01h 0000000000000006->0000000075B2406F 000000006FA6BB6B->000000006FA6BC88
03h 000000006FA6BF8D->000000006FA6BB42 000000006FA6BC8F->000000006FA6BF89
05h 000000006FA6BB6B->000000006FA6BC88 000000006FA6BF8D->000000006FA6BB42
07h 000000006FA6BC8F->000000006FA6BF89 000000006FA6BB6B->000000006FA6BC88
09h 000000006FA6BF8D->000000006FA6BB42 000000006FA6BC8F->000000006FA6BF89
0Bh 000000006FA6BB6B->000000006FA6BC88 000000006FA6BF8D->000000006FA6BB42
0Dh 000000006FA6BC8F->000000006FA6BF89 000000006FA6BB6B->000000006FA6BC88
0Fh 000000006FA6BF8D->000000006FA6BB42 0000000075B2407A->0000000078AB5660
CALL ImageBase ImageName+Offset
00h 0000000000000000 No Image Information
CALL ImageBase ImageName+Offset
STACK 00h 04h 08h 0Ch 10h 14h 18h 1Ch
RSP+00h 3F478E6D 3D2E4BE0 3D2E4FC0 00000001 3F37F208 6FA6A617 3F37F208 00000000
RSP+20h 3F37F2C0 3F37F208 3F466A96 6FA6B52E 6FA67876 3F37F208 3F37F208 3F37F180
RSP+40h 3F469F11 00000000 00000000 00000000 6FA6A2B7 3F44120B 6FA67851 3F441B6C
RSP+60h 00000002 00000000 00000000 3F4354B2 6FA67851 3F43FAD4 2F89A000 3F440ACF
RSP+80h 00000000 3F43FAD4 6FA67851 3F43EE6E 3F4337B7 3F37EDE0 6FA6AB8A 3F433814
RSP+A0h 3F4338A6 6FA6CF13 3F380240 6FA6A0FD 6FA6C8F0 3F4FFFDA 3F3802C0 6FA6B149
RSP+C0h 3F380540 74002D18 00000000 74012640 6FA63017 6FBEDDE8 453C4D9E 453C3380
RSP+E0h 74006A18 73A51018 00000000 6F8FED98 6FA62000 00001000 798FE018 7400C398
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 2:28 PM Vuk Gojnic <vuk.gojnic at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Julia,hello everybody,
>
> I have finally got some time to test it further and found some interesting things (see below). I have also got some good tips and support in the IRC.
>
> I have changed the defaults and set both boot parameters to "uefi":
> [deploy]
> default_boot_mode = uefi
>
> [ilo]
> default_boot_mode = uefi
>
> It is detecting the mode correctly and properly configures server to boot. See some latest extract from logs related to "openstack baremetal node provide" operation:
>
> 2021-05-10 08:45:28.233 561784 INFO ironic.conductor.task_manager [req-24fe55db-c252-471c-9639-9ad43a15137b - - - - -] Node ca718c74-77a6-46df-8b44-6a83db6a0ebe moved to provision state "cleaning" from state "manageable"; target provision state is "available"
> 2021-05-10 08:45:32.235 561784 INFO ironic.drivers.modules.ilo.power [req-24fe55db-c252-471c-9639-9ad43a15137b - - - - -] The node ca718c74-77a6-46df-8b44-6a83db6a0ebe operation of 'power off' is completed in 2 seconds.
> 2021-05-10 08:45:32.255 561784 INFO ironic.conductor.utils [req-24fe55db-c252-471c-9639-9ad43a15137b - - - - -] Successfully set node ca718c74-77a6-46df-8b44-6a83db6a0ebe power state to power off by power off.
> 2021-05-10 08:45:34.056 561784 INFO ironic.drivers.modules.ilo.common [req-24fe55db-c252-471c-9639-9ad43a15137b - - - - -] Node ca718c74-77a6-46df-8b44-6a83db6a0ebe pending boot mode is uefi.
> 2021-05-10 08:45:35.470 561784 INFO ironic.drivers.modules.ilo.common [req-24fe55db-c252-471c-9639-9ad43a15137b - - - - -] Set the node ca718c74-77a6-46df-8b44-6a83db6a0ebe to boot from URL https://10.23.137.234/tmp-images/ilo/boot-ca718c74-77a6-46df-8b44-6a83db6a0ebe.iso?filename=tmpi262v2zy.iso successfully.
> 2021-05-10 08:45:43.485 561784 WARNING oslo.service.loopingcall [-] Function 'ironic.drivers.modules.ilo.power._wait_for_state_change.<locals>._wait' run outlasted interval by 1.32 sec
> 2021-05-10 08:45:44.857 561784 INFO ironic.drivers.modules.ilo.power [req-24fe55db-c252-471c-9639-9ad43a15137b - - - - -] The node ca718c74-77a6-46df-8b44-6a83db6a0ebe operation of 'power on' is completed in 4 seconds.
> 2021-05-10 08:45:44.872 561784 INFO ironic.conductor.utils [req-24fe55db-c252-471c-9639-9ad43a15137b - - - - -] Successfully set node ca718c74-77a6-46df-8b44-6a83db6a0ebe power state to power on by rebooting.
> 2021-05-10 08:45:44.884 561784 INFO ironic.conductor.task_manager [req-24fe55db-c252-471c-9639-9ad43a15137b - - - - -] Node ca718c74-77a6-46df-8b44-6a83db6a0ebe moved to provision state "clean wait" from state "cleaning"; target provision state is "available"
>
> Everyhing goes ok and I come to Grub2.
>
> I can load the kernel with:
> grub> linux /vmlinuz
>
> However when I try to load initrd with:
> grub> initrd /initrd
>
> It first waits and goes to black screen with red cursor which is frozen.
>
> I have tried same procedure with standard ubuntu kernel and initrd from http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/bionic/main/installer-amd64/current/images/hd-media/ and it works correctly and starts the installer.
>
> I went to try the combinations:
> - kernel from Ubuntu server + initrd from custom IPA: this was failing the same way as described above
> - kernel from IPA + initrd from Ubuntu server: this was working and starting the Ubuntu installer.
> - kernel from Ubuntu servetr + initrd from IPA download server (ipa-centos8-stable-victoria.initramfs): failing same as above.
>
> I am pretty lost with what is going on :( Does anyone have more ideas?
>
> -Vuk
>
> On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 8:42 PM Julia Kreger <juliaashleykreger at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Adding the list back and trimming the message. Replies in-band.
>>
>> Well, that is good that the server is not signed, nor other esp images
>> are not working.
>> On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 11:20 AM Vuk Gojnic <vuk.gojnic at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hey Julia,
>> >
>> > Thanks for asking. I have tried with several ESP image options with same effect (one taken from Ubuntu Live ISO that boots on that node, another downloaded and third made with grub tools). None of them was signed.
>>
>> Interesting. At least it is consistent! Have you tried to pull down
>> the iso image and take it apart to verify it is UEFI bootable against
>> a VM or another physical machine?
>>
>> I'm wondering if you need both uefi parameters set. You definitely
>> don't have properties['capabilities']['boot_mode'] set which is used
>> or... maybe a better word to use is drawn in for asserting defaults,
>> but you do have the deploy_boot_mode setting set.
>>
>> I guess a quick manual sanity check of the actual resulting iso image
>> is going to be critical. Debug logging may also be useful, and I'm
>> only thinking that because there is no logging from the generation of
>> the image.
>>
>> >
>> > The server is not in UEFI secure boot mode.
>>
>> Interesting, sure sounds like it is based on your original message. :(
>>
>> > Btw. I will be on holidays for next week so I might not be able to follow up on this discussion before Apr 12th.
>>
>> No worries, just ping us on irc.freenode.net in #openstack-ironic if a
>> reply on the mailing list doesn't grab our attention.
>>
>> >
>> > Bests,
>> > Vuk
>> >
>> > On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 4:20 PM Julia Kreger <juliaashleykreger at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Greetings,
>> >>
>> >> Two questions:
>> >> 1) Are the ESP image contents signed, or are they built using one of
>> >> the grub commands?
>> >> 2) Is the machine set to enforce secure boot at this time?
>> >>
>> >>
>> [trim]
More information about the openstack-discuss
mailing list