Open Stack

Hi,

Dnia środa, 5 maja 2021 22:44:29 CEST Michael Johnson pisze:
> Slawek,
> 
> The open patches for neutron-lbaas are clearly stale (untouched for
> over a year). I don't think there would be an issue closing those out
> in preparation to mark the branch EOL.

Thx for checking them and for that info.

> 
> Michael
> 
> On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 1:09 PM Slawek Kaplonski <skaplons at redhat.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Dnia środa, 5 maja 2021 20:35:48 CEST Előd Illés pisze:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > Ocata is unfortunately unmaintained for a long time as some general test
> > > jobs are broken there, so as a stable-maint-core member I support to tag
> > > neutron's stable/ocata as End of Life. After the branch is tagged,
> > > please ping me and I can arrange the deletion of the branch.
> > > 
> > > For Pike, I volunteered at the PTG in 2020 to help with reviews there, I
> > > still keep that offer, however I am clearly not enough to keep it
> > > maintained, besides backports are not arriving for stable/pike in
> > > neutron. Anyway, if the gate is functional there, then I say we could
> > > keep it open (but as far as I see how gate situation is worsen now, as
> > > more and more things go wrong, I don't expect that will take long). If
> > > not, then I only ask that let's do the EOL'ing first with Ocata and when
> > > it is done, then continue with neutron's stable/pike.
> > > 
> > > For the process please follow the steps here:
> > > https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/stable-branches.html#end-of-life
> > > (with the only exception, that in the last step, instead of infra team,
> > > please turn to me/release team - patch for the documentation change is
> > > on the way:
> > > https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-team-guide/+/789932 )
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > 
> > Thx Elod for volunteering for maintaining stable/pike. Neutron stable team
> > will also definitely be able to help with that if needed but my proposal 
came
> > mostly from the fact that there is no any opened patches for that branch
> > proposed since pretty long time already.
> > Of course I will for now do EOL of Ocata and we can get back to Pike in 
few
> > weeks/months to check how things are going there.
> > 
> > > Előd
> > > 
> > > On 2021. 05. 05. 16:13, Slawek Kaplonski wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > I checked today that stable/ocata and stable/pike branches in both
> > > > Neutron and neutron stadium projects are pretty inactive since long 
time.
> > > > 
> > > > * according to [1], last patch merged patch in Neutron for stable/pike
> > > > was in July 2020 and in ocata October 2019,
> > > > 
> > > > * for stadium projects, according to [2] it was September 2020.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > According to [3] and [4] there are no opened patches for any of those
> > > > branches for Neutron and any stadium project except neutron-lbaas.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > So based on that info I want to propose that we will close both those
> > > > branches are EOL now and before doing that, I would like to know if
> > > > anyone would like to keep those branches to be open still.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > [1]
> > > > https://review.opendev.org/q/project:%255Eopenstack/neutron+
> > 
> > (branch:stable/ocata+OR+branch:stable/pike)+status:merged
> > 
> > > > <https://review.opendev.org/q/project:%255Eopenstack/neutron+
> > 
> > (branch:stable/ocata+OR+branch:stable/pike)+status:merged>
> > 
> > > > [2]
> > > > https://review.opendev.org/q/(project:openstack/
> > 
> > ovsdbapp+OR+project:openstack/os-ken+OR+project:%255Eopenstack/
> > neutron-.*+OR+project:%255Eopenstack/networki
> > 
> > > > ng-.*)+(branch:stable/ocata+OR+branch:stable/pike)+status:merged
> > > > <https://review.opendev.org/q/(project:openstack/
> > 
> > ovsdbapp+OR+project:openstack/os-ken+OR+project:%255Eopenstack/
> > neutron-.*+OR+project:%255Eopenstack/networ
> > 
> > > > king-.*)+(branch:stable/ocata+OR+branch:stable/pike)+status:merged>
> > > > 
> > > > [3]
> > > > https://review.opendev.org/q/project:%255Eopenstack/neutron+
> > 
> > (branch:stable/ocata+OR+branch:stable/pike)+status:open
> > 
> > > > <https://review.opendev.org/q/project:%255Eopenstack/neutron+
> > 
> > (branch:stable/ocata+OR+branch:stable/pike)+status:open>
> > 
> > > > [4]
> > > > https://review.opendev.org/q/(project:openstack/
> > 
> > ovsdbapp+OR+project:openstack/os-ken+OR+project:%255Eopenstack/
> > neutron-.*+OR+project:%255Eopenstack/networki
> > 
> > > > ng-.*)+(branch:stable/ocata+OR+branch:stable/pike)+status:open
> > > > <https://review.opendev.org/q/(project:openstack/
> > 
> > ovsdbapp+OR+project:openstack/os-ken+OR+project:%255Eopenstack/
> > neutron-.*+OR+project:%255Eopenstack/networ
> > 
> > > > king-.*)+(branch:stable/ocata+OR+branch:stable/pike)+status:open>
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > --
> > > > 
> > > > Slawek Kaplonski
> > > > 
> > > > Principal Software Engineer
> > > > 
> > > > Red Hat
> > 
> > --
> > Slawek Kaplonski
> > Principal Software Engineer
> > Red Hat


-- 
Slawek Kaplonski
Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20210506/1c708d45/attachment.sig>