Open Stack

Hi,

Dnia środa, 5 maja 2021 20:35:48 CEST Előd Illés pisze:
> Hi,
> 
> Ocata is unfortunately unmaintained for a long time as some general test
> jobs are broken there, so as a stable-maint-core member I support to tag
> neutron's stable/ocata as End of Life. After the branch is tagged,
> please ping me and I can arrange the deletion of the branch.
> 
> For Pike, I volunteered at the PTG in 2020 to help with reviews there, I
> still keep that offer, however I am clearly not enough to keep it
> maintained, besides backports are not arriving for stable/pike in
> neutron. Anyway, if the gate is functional there, then I say we could
> keep it open (but as far as I see how gate situation is worsen now, as
> more and more things go wrong, I don't expect that will take long). If
> not, then I only ask that let's do the EOL'ing first with Ocata and when
> it is done, then continue with neutron's stable/pike.
> 
> For the process please follow the steps here:
> https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/stable-branches.html#end-of-life
> (with the only exception, that in the last step, instead of infra team,
> please turn to me/release team - patch for the documentation change is
> on the way:
> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-team-guide/+/789932 )
> 
> Thanks,

Thx Elod for volunteering for maintaining stable/pike. Neutron stable team 
will also definitely be able to help with that if needed but my proposal came 
mostly from the fact that there is no any opened patches for that branch 
proposed since pretty long time already.
Of course I will for now do EOL of Ocata and we can get back to Pike in few 
weeks/months to check how things are going there.

> 
> Előd
> 
> On 2021. 05. 05. 16:13, Slawek Kaplonski wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > 
> > I checked today that stable/ocata and stable/pike branches in both
> > Neutron and neutron stadium projects are pretty inactive since long time.
> > 
> > * according to [1], last patch merged patch in Neutron for stable/pike
> > was in July 2020 and in ocata October 2019,
> > 
> > * for stadium projects, according to [2] it was September 2020.
> > 
> > 
> > According to [3] and [4] there are no opened patches for any of those
> > branches for Neutron and any stadium project except neutron-lbaas.
> > 
> > 
> > So based on that info I want to propose that we will close both those
> > branches are EOL now and before doing that, I would like to know if
> > anyone would like to keep those branches to be open still.
> > 
> > 
> > [1]
> > https://review.opendev.org/q/project:%255Eopenstack/neutron+
(branch:stable/ocata+OR+branch:stable/pike)+status:merged
> > <https://review.opendev.org/q/project:%255Eopenstack/neutron+
(branch:stable/ocata+OR+branch:stable/pike)+status:merged>
> > 
> > [2]
> > https://review.opendev.org/q/(project:openstack/
ovsdbapp+OR+project:openstack/os-ken+OR+project:%255Eopenstack/
neutron-.*+OR+project:%255Eopenstack/networki
> > ng-.*)+(branch:stable/ocata+OR+branch:stable/pike)+status:merged
> > <https://review.opendev.org/q/(project:openstack/
ovsdbapp+OR+project:openstack/os-ken+OR+project:%255Eopenstack/
neutron-.*+OR+project:%255Eopenstack/networ
> > king-.*)+(branch:stable/ocata+OR+branch:stable/pike)+status:merged>
> > 
> > [3]
> > https://review.opendev.org/q/project:%255Eopenstack/neutron+
(branch:stable/ocata+OR+branch:stable/pike)+status:open
> > <https://review.opendev.org/q/project:%255Eopenstack/neutron+
(branch:stable/ocata+OR+branch:stable/pike)+status:open>
> > 
> > [4]
> > https://review.opendev.org/q/(project:openstack/
ovsdbapp+OR+project:openstack/os-ken+OR+project:%255Eopenstack/
neutron-.*+OR+project:%255Eopenstack/networki
> > ng-.*)+(branch:stable/ocata+OR+branch:stable/pike)+status:open
> > <https://review.opendev.org/q/(project:openstack/
ovsdbapp+OR+project:openstack/os-ken+OR+project:%255Eopenstack/
neutron-.*+OR+project:%255Eopenstack/networ
> > king-.*)+(branch:stable/ocata+OR+branch:stable/pike)+status:open>
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > 
> > Slawek Kaplonski
> > 
> > Principal Software Engineer
> > 
> > Red Hat


-- 
Slawek Kaplonski
Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20210505/5e85e1ff/attachment.sig>