[manila][requirements] FFE requested for python-manilaclient

Goutham Pacha Ravi gouthampravi at gmail.com
Wed Mar 17 05:42:25 UTC 2021


On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 1:30 AM Herve Beraud <hberaud at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> As already discussed with you on IRC if these changes are merged ASAP and if Matthew is Ok from a requirements perspective then I'm ok to proceed.
>
> A version of python-manilaclient client have been frozen yesterday so now we can take advantage of the RFE mechanismes to land these changes that face a flaky CI.

Thank you so much for your patience, Hervé. We found a bug on the
server side that was causing the client CI to be flaky.
It's fixed now, and all changes have merged.

I requested a release: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/780999


>
> Le lun. 15 mars 2021 à 23:59, Goutham Pacha Ravi <gouthampravi at gmail.com> a écrit :
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 3:47 PM Matthew Thode <mthode at mthode.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > On 21-03-15 14:48:12, Goutham Pacha Ravi wrote:
>> > > Hello,
>> > >
>> > > We were tracking one last feature inclusion into python-manilaclient
>> > > for the wallaby release:
>> > > https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-manilaclient/+/775020
>> > >
>> > > The change does not introduce any new requirements, but adds new SDK
>> > > methods and shell implementations for end users to harness a feature
>> > > addition in manila to be able to update their security services.
>> > >
>> > > The release team was very gracious in allowing us to wrap up code
>> > > reviews pertaining to the above change over the weekend; however, the
>> > > gate was uncooperative this morning by pointing us to lingering
>> > > sporadic failures that are a combination of bad test case logic as
>> > > well as occasional test environment setup issues. (Zuul is awesome,
>> > > but it has a way to call out our procrastinations)
>> > >
>> > > No projects that depend on python-manilaclient need this change in
>> > > their current form because it is net new feature functionality
>> > > (existing SDK/CLI functionality is unaltered). However, I thought i
>> > > should check here before requesting a re-release of
>> > > python-manilaclient under the Wallaby cycle.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Goutham
>> > >
>> >
>> > Fine by me from a requirements perspective.  Thanks.  I imagine this
>> > will be a version bump on top of https://review.opendev.org/780667 then?
>>
>> Yes. I worked with Hervé Beraud to get that release in, and pursue
>> this FFE/RFE in parallel to include
>> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-manilaclient/+/775020
>> into 2.6.0.
>>
>>
>> >
>> > --
>> > Matthew Thode
>>
>
>
> --
> Hervé Beraud
> Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat
> irc: hberaud
> https://github.com/4383/
> https://twitter.com/4383hberaud
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> wsFcBAABCAAQBQJb4AwCCRAHwXRBNkGNegAALSkQAHrotwCiL3VMwDR0vcja10Q+
> Kf31yCutl5bAlS7tOKpPQ9XN4oC0ZSThyNNFVrg8ail0SczHXsC4rOrsPblgGRN+
> RQLoCm2eO1AkB0ubCYLaq0XqSaO+Uk81QxAPkyPCEGT6SRxXr2lhADK0T86kBnMP
> F8RvGolu3EFjlqCVgeOZaR51PqwUlEhZXZuuNKrWZXg/oRiY4811GmnvzmUhgK5G
> 5+f8mUg74hfjDbR2VhjTeaLKp0PhskjOIKY3vqHXofLuaqFDD+WrAy/NgDGvN22g
> glGfj472T3xyHnUzM8ILgAGSghfzZF5Skj2qEeci9cB6K3Hm3osj+PbvfsXE/7Kw
> m/xtm+FjnaywZEv54uCmVIzQsRIm1qJscu20Qw6Q0UiPpDFqD7O6tWSRKdX11UTZ
> hwVQTMh9AKQDBEh2W9nnFi9kzSSNu4OQ1dRMcYHWfd9BEkccezxHwUM4Xyov5Fe0
> qnbfzTB1tYkjU78loMWFaLa00ftSxP/DtQ//iYVyfVNfcCwfDszXLOqlkvGmY1/Y
> F1ON0ONekDZkGJsDoS6QdiUSn8RZ2mHArGEWMV00EV5DCIbCXRvywXV43ckx8Z+3
> B8qUJhBqJ8RS2F+vTs3DTaXqcktgJ4UkhYC2c1gImcPRyGrK9VY0sCT+1iA+wp/O
> v6rDpkeNksZ9fFSyoY2o
> =ECSj
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>



More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list