Open Stack

I feel like it should redirect? But if the .io site isn't what corresponds
to the open source repo that exists in opendev, we need to make that very
clear everywhere possible.

-Kendall (diablo_rojo)

On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 1:54 AM Mark Goddard <mark at stackhpc.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 at 01:17, Michael Johnson <johnsomor at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Oh, nice. I missed the memo on the URL change.
> If stackalytics.com is less well maintained, should it be abandoned?
> Or redirect to stackalytics.io?
> Mark
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Michael
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 5:08 PM Andrii Ostapenko <anost1986 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Michael,
> > >
> > > https://www.stackalytics.io is updated daily and maintained.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 6:55 PM Michael Johnson <johnsomor at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Just an FYI, stackalytics hasn't updated since January, so it's not
> > > > going to be a good, current, source of information.
> > > >
> > > > Michael
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 12:00 PM Andrii Ostapenko <
> anost1986 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Jimmy,
> > > > >
> > > > > Stackalytics [0] currently tracks emails identifying and grouping
> them
> > > > > by author, company, module (with some success).
> > > > > To answer your challenge we'll need to add a grouping by thread,
> but
> > > > > still need some criteria to mark thread as possibly unanswered.
> E.g.
> > > > > threads having a single message or only messages from a single
> author,
> > > > > or if the last message in a thread contains a question mark.
> > > > >
> > > > > With no additional information marking thread as closed explicitly,
> > > > > all this will still be a guessing, producing candidates for
> unanswered
> > > > > threads.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you for bringing this up!
> > > > >
> > > > > [0] https://www.stackalytics.io/?metric=emails
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 12:48 PM Jimmy McArthur <
> jimmy at openstack.org> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi All -
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Over the last six months or so, we've had feedback from people
> that feel their questions die on the ML or that are missing
> ask.openstack.org.  I don't think we should open up the ask.openstack.org
> can of worms, by any means.  However, I wanted to find out if there was any
> software out there we could use to track metrics on which questions go
> unanswered on the ML.  Everything I've found is very focused on email
> marketing, which is not what we're after.  Would love to try to get some
> numbers on individuals that are trying to reach out to the ML, but just
> aren't getting through to anyone.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Assuming we get that, I feel like it would be an easy next step
> to do a monthly or bi-monthly check to reach out to these potential new
> contributors.  I realize our community is busy and people are, by and
> large, volunteering their time to answer these questions.  But as hard as
> that is, it's also tough to pose new questions to a community you're
> unfamiliar with and then hear crickets.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Open to other ideas/thoughts :)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cheers!
> > > > > > Jimmy
> > > > >
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20210315/315d9c5b/attachment-0001.html>