Open Stack

Hi,

Dnia środa, 3 marca 2021 11:50:59 CET Lingxian Kong pisze:
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 5:15 PM Sean Mooney <smooney at redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 15:59 +1300, Lingxian Kong wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > Thanks for all your hard work on this.
> > > 
> > > I'm wondering is there any doc proposed for devstack to tell people who
> > 
> > are
> > 
> > > not interested in OVN to keep the current devstack behaviour? I have a
> > > feeling that using OVN as default Neutron driver would break the CI jobs
> > > for some projects like Octavia, Trove, etc. which rely on ovs port for
> > 
> > the
> > 
> > > set up.
> > 
> > well ovn is just an alternivie contoler for ovs.
> > so ovn replace the neutron l2 agent it does not replace ovs.
> > project like octavia or trove that deploy loadblances or dbs in vms should
> > not be able to observe a difference.
> > they may still want to deploy ml2/ovs but unless they are doing something
> > directly on the host like adding port
> > directly to ovs because they are not using vms they should not be aware of
> > this change.
> 
> Yes, they are.
> 
> Please see
> https://github.com/openstack/octavia/blob/master/devstack/plugin.sh#L466 as
> an example for Octavia.

I'm really not an Octavia expert but AFAIK we are testing Octavia with ML2/OVN 
in TripleO jobs already as we switched default neutron backend in TripleO to 
be ML2/OVN somewhere around Stein cycle IIRC.

> ---
> Lingxian Kong
> Senior Cloud Engineer (Catalyst Cloud)
> Trove PTL (OpenStack)
> OpenStack Cloud Provider Co-Lead (Kubernetes)


-- 
Slawek Kaplonski
Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20210303/d9b7bc14/attachment.sig>