Open Stack

On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 5:15 PM Sean Mooney <smooney at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 15:59 +1300, Lingxian Kong wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for all your hard work on this.
> >
> > I'm wondering is there any doc proposed for devstack to tell people who
> are
> > not interested in OVN to keep the current devstack behaviour? I have a
> > feeling that using OVN as default Neutron driver would break the CI jobs
> > for some projects like Octavia, Trove, etc. which rely on ovs port for
> the
> > set up.
>
> well ovn is just an alternivie contoler for ovs.
> so ovn replace the neutron l2 agent it does not replace ovs.
> project like octavia or trove that deploy loadblances or dbs in vms should
> not be able to observe a difference.
> they may still want to deploy ml2/ovs but unless they are doing something
> directly on the host like adding port
> directly to ovs because they are not using vms they should not be aware of
> this change.
>

Yes, they are.

Please see
https://github.com/openstack/octavia/blob/master/devstack/plugin.sh#L466 as
an example for Octavia.
---
Lingxian Kong
Senior Cloud Engineer (Catalyst Cloud)
Trove PTL (OpenStack)
OpenStack Cloud Provider Co-Lead (Kubernetes)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20210303/0fdde35b/attachment.html>