On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 6:15 PM Marios Andreou <marios at redhat.com> wrote: > > Hello folks > > As brought to my attention this morning, we still have some open > reviews against stein [1] and queens [2]. I just realised that the queries at [1] and [2] will now be empty since I abandoned them already :D For reference these are the things I just abandoned: STEIN * https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-puppet-elements/+/758510 * https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-validations/+/764613 * https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/+/780602 * https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-tripleoclient/+/723633 * https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/+/656935 * https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-validations/+/771794 * https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/+/656934 * https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-common/+/761243 * https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/+/761244 * https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-common/+/761245 QUEENS * https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-common/+/794814 * https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/+/778748 * https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/puppet-tripleo/+/782831 * https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/puppet-tripleo/+/782535 * https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-upgrade/+/792016 * https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/+/790544 * https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/+/789708 * https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/+/790316 * https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/+/771196 * https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/+/562215 * https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-common/+/774424 * https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/+/773595 * https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/+/729613 * https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/+/754229 * https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-validations/+/748713 * https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-common/+/740293 thanks, marios > > Since we have agreed to EOL those branches we should not be merging > any new code there (if this is news to you (!) see [3] - EOL patches > at [4][5]). > I am going to go through and abandon all the patches in [1][2]. > > If this causes problems for you then please reach out to me ASAP so we > can work something out if possible (may be harder for stein, e.g. we'd > have to address some broken jobs first). For example, we can try and > merge your patch and then resend the EOL patches at [4][5]. > > Once the patches at [4][5] merge (which is looking pretty close, they > have at least one +2 from the release team) then all bets are off we > can't merge anything else there. > > regards, marios > > [1] https://review.opendev.org/q/(project:%255Eopenstack/.*tripleo.*)AND(status:open)AND(branch:stable/stein) > [2] https://review.opendev.org/q/(project:%255Eopenstack/.*tripleo.*)AND(status:open)AND(branch:stable/queens) > [3] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-June/023409.html > [4] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/798924 > [5] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/798925