Open Stack

On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 4:22 PM Hongbin Lu <kira034 at 163.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am a maintainer of the Zun project. From my perspective, I would like to
> have Zun supported by different deployment tools to minimize complexities
> for installing and managing the service. If TripleO community interests to
> add support for Zun, I am happy to provide necessary supports.
>

Because TripleO relies on modulus maintained by Puppet OpenStack project to
manipulate configurations,
you'd need to start with creating a new puppet module (puppet-zun) for it.

Also, we need distro packages to support zun in Puppet OpenStack and
TripleO.
Puppet-openstack relies on packages to install services , and TripleO
relies on RDO in CI.
I quickly checked RDO but it seems there are no zun packages there.
Also Ubuntu has zunclient packaged[2] but no packages available for server
side.
 [1] https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=zun&searchon=names


>
> @Lokendra, if you are open to consider alternative tools, I would suggest Kolla [1]. Its support for Zun is quite solid and has CI to cover some basic senario. Another tool is OpenStack Ansible [2]. I didn't try that one myself but it has Zun support based on their document [3]. Lastly, the Zun community maintains an installation guide [4] which you can refer if you want to install it manually.
>
>
> [1] https://docs.openstack.org/kolla-ansible/queens/reference/zun-guide.html
>
> [2] https://docs.openstack.org/openstack-ansible/latest/
>
> [3] https://docs.openstack.org/openstack-ansible-os_zun/latest/
>
> [4] https://docs.openstack.org/zun/latest/install/
>
>
>
> Best regards,
> Hongbin
>
>
>
> At 2021-06-30 00:06:50, "Marios Andreou" <marios at redhat.com> wrote:
> >On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 4:45 PM Sean Mooney <smooney at redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, 2021-06-29 at 15:52 +0530, Lokendra Rathour wrote:
> >> > Hi Marios,
> >> > Thank you for the information.
> >> >
> >> > With respect to the *second question*, please note:
> >> > "is there any alternative to deploy containerize services in TripleO?"
> >> >
> >> > In our use case, in addition to having our workloads in VNFs, we also want
> >> > to have containerized deployment of certain workloads on top of OpenStack.
> >> > Zun service could give us that flexibility. Is there any reason that
> >> > deployment of Zun with TripleO is not supported? And is there an
> >> > alternative to Zun that the community is using in productions for deploying
> >> > containerized workloads on top of OpenStack?
> >>
> >> i think marios's resopnce missed that zun is the containers as a service project
> >> which provide an alternitive to nova or ironci to provision compute resouces as containers
> >> directly on the physical hosts. in ooo term deploying tenant contaienrs directly on the overcloud host
> >> with docker or podman.
> >
> >indeed I did as I got from Lokendra's reply earlier
> >
> >>
> >> i dont think ooo currently supports this as it is not listed in https://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/src/branch/master/deployment
> >> so to answer your orginal questrion this does not appear to be currently supported.
> >
> >and this isn't somethign I have seen brought up on the irc meetings,
> >ptg or elsewhere. That isn't to say it's impossible (it may be, i just
> >don't know enough about it to say right now ;)). Of course anyone is
> >free to propose  a spec about how this might look and get some
> >feedback before working on it in tripleo.
> >
> >
> >regards, marios
> >
> >> >
> >> > please advise.
> >> >
> >> > Regards,
> >> > Lokendra
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 3:16 PM Marios Andreou <marios at redhat.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 11:36 AM Lokendra Rathour <
> >> > > lokendrarathour at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Hello Everyone,
> >> > > > We are curious in understanding the usage of ZUN Sevice in TripleO with
> >> > > > respect to which we have questions as below:
> >> > > >
> >> > > >    1. Does TripleO Support ZUN?
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > no
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >    1. If not then, is there any alternative to deploy containerize
> >> > > >    services in TripleO?
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > yes we have been deploying services with containers since  queens and this
> >> > > is the default (in fact we have stopped supporting non containerized
> >> > > services altogether for a few releases now). For the default list of
> >> > > containers see [1] and information regarding the deployment can be found in
> >> > > [2] (though note that is community best effort docs so beware it may be a
> >> > > bit outdated in places).
> >> > >
> >> > > hope it helps for now
> >> > >
> >> > > regards, marios
> >> > >
> >> > > [1]
> >> > > https://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-common/src/commit/5836974cf216f5230843e0c63eea21194b527368/container-images/tripleo_containers.yaml
> >> > > [2]
> >> > > https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/tripleo-docs/latest/deployment/install_overcloud.html#deploy-the-overcloud
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Any support with respect to the questions raised will definitely help us
> >> > > > in deciding the tripleO usage.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > --
> >> > > > ~ Lokendra
> >> > > > skype: lokendrarathour
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20210701/2fec296b/attachment.html>