Hi, could we also add the RFE VPNaaS for OVN? Especially to discuss what may be blocking the spec to be accepted. [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1905391 <https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1905391> Thank you Bodo Petermann (bpetermann) ------ SysEleven GmbH Boxhagener Straße 80 10245 Berlin T +49 30 233 2012 0 F +49 30 616 7555 0 http://www.syseleven.de <http://www.syseleven.de/> http://www.facebook.com/SysEleven <http://www.facebook.com/SysEleven> http://www.twitter.com/syseleven <http://www.twitter.com/syseleven> Aktueller System-Status immer unter: https://www.syseleven-status.net/ <https://www.syseleven-status.net/> Firmensitz: Berlin Registergericht: AG Berlin Charlottenburg, HRB 108571 B Geschäftsführer: Marc Korthaus, Jens Ihlenfeld > Am 28.01.2021 um 13:11 schrieb Slawek Kaplonski <skaplons at redhat.com>: > > Hi, > > Agenda for tomorrow's drivers meeting is available at [1]. > We have 2 things to discuss: > > * 1 RFE - [RFE] [QoS] add qos rule type packet per second (pps) [2] > * 1 On demand topic - Do we want to apply for tag > 'assert:supports-api-interoperability' - see [3] for details. > > See You tomorrow on the meeting. > > [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NeutronDrivers#Agenda > [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1912460 > [3] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-December/019505.html > > -- > Slawek Kaplonski > Principal Software Engineer > Red Hat -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20210128/d43134f3/attachment.html>