[barbican][oslo][nova][glance][cinder] cursive library status
Brian Rosmaita
rosmaita.fossdev at gmail.com
Wed Jan 13 13:41:21 UTC 2021
On 1/11/21 10:57 AM, Moises Guimaraes de Medeiros wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> During Oslo's last weekly meeting [1] we decided that Oslo can take
> cursive under its umbrella with collaboration of Barbican folks. I just
> waited a bit with this confirmation as the Barbican PTL was on PTO and I
> wanted to confirm with him.
>
> What are the next steps from here?
Thanks so much for following up! I think you need to do something like
these patches from Ghanshyam to move devstack-plugin-nfs from x/ to
openstack/ and bring it under QA governance:
https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/711834
https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/711835
LMK if you want me to propose the patches, my intent is to get this
issue solved, not to make more work for you!
cheers,
brian
>
> [1]:
> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/oslo/2021/oslo.2021-01-04-16.00.log.html#l-64
> <http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/oslo/2021/oslo.2021-01-04-16.00.log.html#l-64>
>
> Thanks,
> Moisés
>
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 10:06 PM Douglas Mendizabal <dmendiza at redhat.com
> <mailto:dmendiza at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> On 12/16/20 12:50 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 12/16/20 12:02 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
> >> Hello Barbican team,
> >>
> >> Apologies for not including barbican in the previous thread on this
> >> topic:
> >>
> >>
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-December/019430.html
> <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-December/019430.html>
>
> >>
> >>
> >> The situation is that cursive is used by Nova, Glance, and
> Cinder and
> >> we'd like to move it out of the 'x' namespace into openstack
> >> governance. The question is then what team would oversee it. It
> >> seems like a good fit for Oslo, and the Oslo team seems OK with
> that,
> >> but since barbican-core is currently included in cursive-core,
> it make
> >> sense to give the Barbican team first dibs.
> >>
> >> From the consuming teams' side, I don't think we have a
> preference as
> >> long as it's clear who we need to bother about approvals if a
> bugfix
> >> is posted for review.
> >>
> >> Thus my ask is that the Barbican team indicate whether they'd
> like to
> >> move cursive to the 'openstack' namespace under their
> governance, or
> >> whether they'd prefer Oslo to oversee the library.
> >
> > Note that this is not necessarily an either/or thing. Castellan
> is under
> > Oslo governance but is co-owned by the Oslo and Barbican teams.
> We could
> > do a similar thing with Cursive.
> >
>
> Hi Brian and Ben,
>
> Sorry I missed the original thread. Given that the end of the year is
> around the corner, most of the Barbican team is out on PTO and we
> haven't had a chance to discuss this in our weekly meeting.
>
> That said, I doubt anyone would object to moving cursive into the
> openstack namespace.
>
> I personally do not mind the Oslo team taking over maintenace, and I am
> also willing to help review patches if the Oslo team would like to
> co-own this library just like we currently do for Castellan.
>
> - Douglas Mendizábal (redrobot)
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Moisés Guimarães
>
> Software Engineer
>
> Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com>
>
> <https://red.ht/sig>
>
More information about the openstack-discuss
mailing list