[oslo][TC] Dropping lower-constraints testing
Ghanshyam Mann
gmann at ghanshyammann.com
Wed Jan 6 18:00:12 UTC 2021
---- On Wed, 06 Jan 2021 06:43:18 -0600 Slawek Kaplonski <skaplons at redhat.com> wrote ----
> Hi,
>
> Dnia środa, 6 stycznia 2021 13:00:31 CET Herve Beraud pisze:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > Here is an email to officialize our position on Olso concerning our
> > lower-constraints testing policy.
> > Indeed we reached a consensus during our last meeting and all the Oslo
> > cores who spoke agreed with this decision to drop the L.C tests [1].
> >
> > So we already started to drop lower-constraints jobs on Oslo to unlock our
> > gates.
>
> Sorry if my question shouldn't be in that thread but does that mean that other
> projects should/can drop lower constraints jobs too? Is it some general,
> OpenStack wide decision or it depends on the project?
Yeah this is a good question till now we have been discussing specific project wise
dropping like oslo in this thread and Ironic and other projects in another discussion.
I am starting a separate thread to discuss it for all the projects as a general recommendation.
-http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-January/019672.html
-gmann
>
> >
> > Thanks to everyone who joined the discussion and thanks for reading!
> >
> > [1]
> > http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/oslo/2021/oslo.2021-01-04-16.00.log.
> > txt #topic Dropping lower-constraints testing
> >
> > Le ven. 18 déc. 2020 à 20:34, Moises Guimaraes de Medeiros <
> >
> > moguimar at redhat.com> a écrit :
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 4:46 PM Ghanshyam Mann <gmann at ghanshyammann.com>
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >> ---- On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 08:54:26 -0600 hberaud <hberaud at redhat.com>
> > >>
> > >> wrote ----
> > >>
> > >> > Hello,
> > >> > As you already surely know, we (the openstack project) currently face
> > >>
> > >> some issues with our lower-constraints jobs due to pip's latest resolver
> > >> feature.
> > >>
> > >> > By discussing this topic with Thierry Carrez (ttx) from an oslo point
> > >>
> > >> of view, we reached the same conclusion that it is more appropriate to
> > >> drop
> > >> this kind of tests because the complexity and recurring pain neededto
> > >> maintain them now exceeds the benefits provided by this mechanismes.
> > >>
> > >> > Also we should notice that the number of active maintainers is
> > >>
> > >> declining, so we think that this is the shortest path to solve this
> > >> problem
> > >> on oslo for now and for the future too.
> > >>
> > >> > In a first time I tried to fix our gates by fixing our
> > >>
> > >> lower-constraints project by project but with around ~36 projects to
> > >> maintain this is a painful task, especially due to nested oslo layers
> > >> inside oslo himself... I saw the face of the hell of dependencies.
> > >>
> > >> > So, in a second time I submitted a series of patches to drop these
> > >>
> > >> tests [1].
> > >>
> > >> > But before moving further with that we would appreciate discussing
> > >>
> > >> this with the TC. For now the patches are ready and we just have to push
> > >> the good button accordingly to our choices (+W or abandon).
> > >>
> > >> > Normally all the oslo projects that need to be fixed are covered by
> > >>
> > >> [1].
> > >>
> > >> > Thoughts?
> > >>
> > >> +1, I think it's not worth to keep maintaining them which is taking too
> > >> much effort.
> > >>
> > >> -gmann
> > >>
> > >> > Thanks for reading.
> > >> >
> > >> > [1]
> > >>
> > >> https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22oslo_lc_drop%22+(status:open%20OR%2
> > >> 0status:merged)>>
> > >> > --
> > >> > Hervé BeraudSenior Software Engineer at Red Hatirc: hberaudhttps://
> > >>
> > >> github.com/4383/https://twitter.com/4383hberaud
> > >>
> > >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > >> >
> > >> > wsFcBAABCAAQBQJb4AwCCRAHwXRBNkGNegAALSkQAHrotwCiL3VMwDR0vcja10Q+
> > >> > Kf31yCutl5bAlS7tOKpPQ9XN4oC0ZSThyNNFVrg8ail0SczHXsC4rOrsPblgGRN+
> > >> > RQLoCm2eO1AkB0ubCYLaq0XqSaO+Uk81QxAPkyPCEGT6SRxXr2lhADK0T86kBnMP
> > >> > F8RvGolu3EFjlqCVgeOZaR51PqwUlEhZXZuuNKrWZXg/oRiY4811GmnvzmUhgK5G
> > >> > 5+f8mUg74hfjDbR2VhjTeaLKp0PhskjOIKY3vqHXofLuaqFDD+WrAy/NgDGvN22g
> > >> > glGfj472T3xyHnUzM8ILgAGSghfzZF5Skj2qEeci9cB6K3Hm3osj+PbvfsXE/7Kw
> > >> > m/xtm+FjnaywZEv54uCmVIzQsRIm1qJscu20Qw6Q0UiPpDFqD7O6tWSRKdX11UTZ
> > >> > hwVQTMh9AKQDBEh2W9nnFi9kzSSNu4OQ1dRMcYHWfd9BEkccezxHwUM4Xyov5Fe0
> > >> > qnbfzTB1tYkjU78loMWFaLa00ftSxP/DtQ//iYVyfVNfcCwfDszXLOqlkvGmY1/Y
> > >> > F1ON0ONekDZkGJsDoS6QdiUSn8RZ2mHArGEWMV00EV5DCIbCXRvywXV43ckx8Z+3
> > >> > B8qUJhBqJ8RS2F+vTs3DTaXqcktgJ4UkhYC2c1gImcPRyGrK9VY0sCT+1iA+wp/O
> > >> > v6rDpkeNksZ9fFSyoY2o
> > >> > =ECSj
> > >> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Moisés Guimarães
> > >
> > > Software Engineer
> > >
> > > Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com>
> > >
> > > <https://red.ht/sig>
> >
> > --
> > Hervé Beraud
> > Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat
> > irc: hberaud
> > https://github.com/4383/
> > https://twitter.com/4383hberaud
>
>
> --
> Slawek Kaplonski
> Principal Software Engineer
> Red Hat
More information about the openstack-discuss
mailing list