Need core reviewers for sqlalchemy-migrate

Thomas Goirand zigo at
Sun Feb 28 17:35:57 UTC 2021

On 2/28/21 5:59 PM, Radosław Piliszek wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 5:23 PM Thomas Goirand <zigo at> wrote:
>> You are right for Keystone. Though...
>> Yes, Murano has a dependency on it, however, as much as I can see, it
>> still uses Alembic. I'm not sure why it still needs migrate. Maybe
>> because it transitionned to Alembic and still has it in tests?
> Yes, it's probably just some old cruft there, please see my other
> message. You posted right after my amendment.
> -yoctozep

So, to sum-up, we have still to fix:

- Keystone
- Nova
- Glance
- Cinder
- Heat
- Designate
- Senlin
- Trove
- Murano (only cruft)

That's a long enough list that probably, we will need SQLAM for at least
one more year (and hopefully, not another decade...).


Thomas Goirand (zigo)

More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list