Need core reviewers for sqlalchemy-migrate
zigo at debian.org
Sun Feb 28 17:35:57 UTC 2021
On 2/28/21 5:59 PM, Radosław Piliszek wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 5:23 PM Thomas Goirand <zigo at debian.org> wrote:
>> You are right for Keystone. Though...
>> Yes, Murano has a dependency on it, however, as much as I can see, it
>> still uses Alembic. I'm not sure why it still needs migrate. Maybe
>> because it transitionned to Alembic and still has it in tests?
> Yes, it's probably just some old cruft there, please see my other
> message. You posted right after my amendment.
So, to sum-up, we have still to fix:
- Murano (only cruft)
That's a long enough list that probably, we will need SQLAM for at least
one more year (and hopefully, not another decade...).
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
More information about the openstack-discuss