Need core reviewers for sqlalchemy-migrate

Thomas Goirand zigo at
Sun Feb 28 16:23:01 UTC 2021

On 2/28/21 4:46 PM, Radosław Piliszek wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 4:25 PM Thomas Goirand <thomas at> wrote:
>>> The
>>> combo of Nova, Glance and Cinder patch series that I'm proposing should get us a
>>> long way there and will serve as a blueprint for other project, so there isn't
>>> really a reason this can't happen in any healthy project over the next cycle.
>> There's also Heat, that uses migrate, if I'm not mistaking. IMO that's
>> also a core project.
>> Appart from it, there's also:
>> - Desginate
>> - Senlin
>> - Trove
>> I don't think there's anyone else that still uses it, so that's 4 core
>> projects, and 3 "less core" projects.
>> I based my survey out of the Debian dependency list, hopefully that
>> doesn't include a mistake.
> It is pretty close!
> See
> I caught Keystone, Murano and oslo.db too.
> -yoctozepto

You are right for Keystone. Though...

Yes, Murano has a dependency on it, however, as much as I can see, it
still uses Alembic. I'm not sure why it still needs migrate. Maybe
because it transitionned to Alembic and still has it in tests?


Thomas Goirand (zigo)

More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list