Open Stack

 ---- On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 11:12:22 -0600 Luigi Toscano <ltoscano at redhat.com> wrote ----
 > On Friday, 26 February 2021 17:59:32 CET Ghanshyam Mann wrote:
 > >  ---- On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 09:23:47 -0600 Brian Rosmaita
 > > <rosmaita.fossdev at gmail.com> wrote ----
 > >  > Luigi's patch has merged, so it's OK to recheck
 > >  > cinder-tempest-plugin-lvm-lio-barbican failures.
 > >  > 
 > >  > On 2/25/21 4:42 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
 > >  > > The backup tests in the cinder-tempest-plugin-lvm-lio-barbican job have
 > >  > > been failing for the past 24 hours or so.  Luigi has a patch up that we
 > >  > > think will fix this:
 > >  > > 
 > >  > > https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder-tempest-plugin/+/777685
 > >  > > 
 > >  > > Until that merges, there's no point in rechecking
 > >  > > cinder-tempest-plugin-lvm-lio-barbican failures.
 > > 
 > > Thanks, I missed your ping on IRC yesterday which I think is for this.
 > > 
 > > Yes, the 'member' role was the default role set by devstack on each Tempest
 > > test user (dynamically created). That was blocking Tempest or plugins to
 > > test the new 'reader' role and testing specific role without a 'member'
 > > role. If that break any job or test then we need to configure it from that
 > > job or test like done in 777685.
 > 
 > Can we have a devstack variable to set this, instead of using devstack_localrc 
 > which is used to populate local.conf and whose values replace anything at the 
 > end?
 > This would allow devstack plugins (like barbican devstack plugin, which adds 
 > "creator") to extend that value (list of roles to be assigned to the tempest 
 > users).

We can which can be set via job and make sense for use cases like barbican. But for others
I expect the test to tell Tempest what all roles they want which will be more clear instead of
setting it as global the role for all Tempest users. 

-gmann

 > 
 > -- 
 > Luigi
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > > 
 > > -gmann
 > > 
 > >  > > cheers,
 > >  > > brian
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 >