[E] Re: [all][stackalytics] stackalytics.io
Andrii Ostapenko
anost1986 at gmail.com
Wed Feb 17 20:24:40 UTC 2021
Hey Jay,
Sorry you encountered it. There were recent changes in reports api to
extend related functionality. You may find a proper link in the module
main page (https://www.stackalytics.io/?module=ironic-group).
Currently only a 30 days link is there, though you may set any number
there. Particularly for your case it will be
https://www.stackalytics.io/report/contribution?module=ironic-group&project_type=openstack&days=90
Also you may find new release specific reports useful. Links are
dynamically generated according to the selected release/company.
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 2:11 PM Jay Faulkner
<jay.faulkner at verizonmedia.com> wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> First of all, thanks for standing up stackalytics.io! I love the idea that open source + open data can be a form of redundancy through re-creation. I did want to draw attention to the fact the review reports (e.g. https://www.stackalytics.com/report/contribution/ironic-group/90) do not appear to be populated on the stackalytics.io server recently stood up. I frequently use these to grade my upstream review performance against my other core-reviewer peers and would appreciate getting it back up.
>
> Thanks again for fixing the main site though, that's great.
>
> -
> Jay Faulkner
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 8:13 AM Andrii Ostapenko <anost1986 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 10:36 PM Sean Mooney <smooney at redhat.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Tue, 2021-01-12 at 22:17 -0600, Andrii Ostapenko wrote:
>> > > Hi all!
>> > >
>> > > Since https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__stackalytics.com&d=DwIBaQ&c=sWW_bEwW_mLyN3Kx2v57Q8e-CRbmiT9yOhqES_g_wVY&r=NKR1jXf8to59hDGraABDUb4djWcsAXM11_v4c7uz0Tg&m=ndfw_yh_qYb8di0GXCiEICm2BhnkwwpPDdmBjTDJdZY&s=HwrXk2cHA2_wlSsTr2-1XXPq3JXpKhCJMaNi98HdLCg&e= is not operational for quite some time
>> > > already, I exposed another instance on https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__stackalytics.io&d=DwIBaQ&c=sWW_bEwW_mLyN3Kx2v57Q8e-CRbmiT9yOhqES_g_wVY&r=NKR1jXf8to59hDGraABDUb4djWcsAXM11_v4c7uz0Tg&m=ndfw_yh_qYb8di0GXCiEICm2BhnkwwpPDdmBjTDJdZY&s=VGP40Fa22Mj3PVrROSMx6aqeY4VQbl2OKdSYTlV5DPE&e=
>> > > It shares the same configuration and is kept updated. You're welcome
>> > > to use it at least until stackalytics.com is up and running (just
>> > > please be gentle).
>> >
>> > is there any documentaiton on how to deploy our own instance of it if we want
>> > too or either go offline in the future?
>>
>> I've started with https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.openstack.org_wiki_Stackalytics_HowToRun&d=DwIBaQ&c=sWW_bEwW_mLyN3Kx2v57Q8e-CRbmiT9yOhqES_g_wVY&r=NKR1jXf8to59hDGraABDUb4djWcsAXM11_v4c7uz0Tg&m=ndfw_yh_qYb8di0GXCiEICm2BhnkwwpPDdmBjTDJdZY&s=NIYaHOOrrOlwkX4bhIiQCx4eeKLRTv99QXYiof8Mu8g&e=
>> Though addressed some blocking code issues and did a couple of enhancements.
>> Will push them once have some time to make the code better.
>>
>> > >
>> > > Sincerely,
>> > > Andrii Ostapenko
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
More information about the openstack-discuss
mailing list