[neutron][victoria] Front / Back Routers

Slawek Kaplonski skaplons at redhat.com
Fri Feb 5 07:33:28 UTC 2021


Hi,

On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 10:08:01PM -0500, Laurent Dumont wrote:
> It's a bit hard to parse a network topology by email, but from a
> theoretical point of view - you can statically route a /24 towards the
> external IP of an openstack router from a device upstream.
> 
> I do believe there is a BGP component for Openstack but I'm not sure it's
> role is to dynamically advertised networks from Openstack towards the wider
> network.

It is neutron-dynamic-routing. Documentation is available at
https://docs.openstack.org/neutron-dynamic-routing/victoria/

> 
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 11:45 AM <DHilsbos at performair.com> wrote:
> 
> > All;
> >
> > My team and I have been working through the tutorials on Server World (
> > server-world.com/ean/), in order to learn and build an OpenStack
> > cluster.  We've also been looking at the official documentation to attempt
> > to increase our knowledge of the subject.
> >
> > I have a question about Neutron though.  All the examples that I remember
> > have Neutron setup with a single router.  The router is part of a
> > "provider" network, and subnet on the outside, and one or more "tenant"
> > networks on the inside.  Floating IPS, then appear to be IP addresses
> > belonging to the "provider" subnet, that are applied to the router, and
> > which the router then NATs.
> >
> > These setups look like this:
> >
> > Physrouter1 (physical router) subnet: 192.168.0.0/24, IP address:
> > 192.168.0.1
> > |
> > Physnet1 (192.168.0.0/24)(ovs network definition)
> > |
> > Router1 (ovs router)(allocation pool: 192.168.0.100 - 192.168.0.254) <--
> > Floating IPs are "owned" by this, and are in the range of the allocation
> > pool
> > |
> > Tenant network(s)
> >
> > This has the advantage of being easy, fast, secure, and simple to setup.
> >
> > What if you wanted something where you could route whole subnet into your
> > OpenStack cluster.
> >
> > Physrouter1 (physical router) subnet: 172.16.255.0/24, IP address:
> > 172.16.255.1
> > |
> > Physnet1 (172.16.255.0/24)(ovs network definition)
> > |
> > Router1 (ovs router)(fixed IP addresses: 172.16.255.2 & 172.16.254.1/24 +
> > static / dynamic routing)
> > |
> > Network (17216.254.0/24)
> > |
> > Router2(ovs router)(allocation pool: 172.16.254.5 - 172.16.254.254) <--
> > Floating IPs are "owned" by this, and are in the range of the allocation
> > pool
> > |
> > Tenant network(s)
> >
> > Is my understanding accurate?
> > Are there advantages of one over the other?
> > What commands are used to specify static IPs for ovs routers, and static
> > routing rules?
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Dominic L. Hilsbos, MBA
> > Director - Information Technology
> > Perform Air International Inc.
> > DHilsbos at PerformAir.com
> > www.PerformAir.com
> >
> >
> >
> >

-- 
Slawek Kaplonski
Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20210205/0cb919e4/attachment.sig>


More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list