Can neutron-fwaas project be revived?

Miguel Lavalle miguel at mlavalle.com
Fri Dec 24 16:18:25 UTC 2021


Hi Qin,

I have added this topic to the drivers meeting agenda (see on demand agenda
close to the bottom):
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NeutronDrivers

Cheers

On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 7:42 PM Dazhong Qin (秦海中)-云数据中心集团 <
qinhaizhong01 at inspur.com> wrote:

> Hi  Miguel,
>
> Thank you for your suggestion. My colleague HengZhou will submit relevant
> documents as soon as possible in accordance with the official neutron rules.
>
> Yes,we will attend the neutron drivers meeting on January 7th.
>
> Merry Christmas!
>
> Best wish for you!
>
>
>
> *发件人:* Miguel Lavalle [mailto:miguel at mlavalle.com]
> *发送时间:* 2021年12月24日 0:43
> *收件人:* Dazhong Qin (秦海中)-云数据中心集团 <qinhaizhong01 at inspur.com>
> *抄送:* openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org
> *主题:* Re: Can neutron-fwaas project be revived?
>
>
>
> Hi Qin,
>
>
>
> In preparation for your meeting with the drivers team, I suggest we follow
> as a starting point the Neutron Stadium Governance rules and processes as
> outlined in the official documentation:
> https://docs.openstack.org/neutron/latest/contributor/stadium/governance.html.
> In the past, we have re-incorporated projects to the Stadium, like for
> example in the case of neutron-vpnaas. This document in the Neutron specs
> repo summarizes how we assessed the readiness of vpnaas for the stadium:
> https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/neutron-specs/specs/stadium/queens/neutron-vpnaas.html
> (https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-specs/+/506012). I
> suggest you start a similar document for fwaas in the folder for the
> current cycle:
> https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/neutron-specs/specs/yoga/index.html.
> As soon as you can, please push it to gerrit, so we can start reviewing it.
>
>
>
> Did I understand correctly that you will attend the drivers meeting on
> January 7th?
>
>
>
> Best regards
>
>
>
> Miguel
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 8:09 PM Dazhong Qin (秦海中)-云数据中心集团 <
> qinhaizhong01 at inspur.com> wrote:
>
> Hi  Miguel,
>
> I am glad to hear this news. How about our discussion on January 7th, this
> Friday is not convenient, what do I need to prepare before the discussion,
> do I need to submit rfe or other descriptions?
>
>
>
> *发件人:* Miguel Lavalle [mailto:miguel at mlavalle.com]
> *发送时间:* 2021年12月23日 0:20
> *收件人:* Dazhong Qin (秦海中)-云数据中心集团 <qinhaizhong01 at inspur.com>
> *抄送:* openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org
> *主题:* Re: Can neutron-fwaas project be revived?
>
>
>
> Hi Qin,
>
>
>
> I think that in principle the community will be delighted if you and your
> team can reactivate the project and maintain it. Probably the best next
> step is for you to attend the next Neutron drivers meeting (
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NeutronDrivers) so we
> can discuss the specifics of your proposal. This meeting takes place on
> Fridays at 1400 UTC over IRC in oftc.net, channel #openstack-neutron. Due
> to the end of year festivities in much of Europe and America, the next
> meeting will take place until January 7th. Is that a good next step for
> you? If yes, I'll add this topic to the meeting's agenda.
>
>
>
> Best regards
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 10:29 AM Dazhong Qin (秦海中)-云数据中心集团 <
> qinhaizhong01 at inspur.com> wrote:
>
> Hi:
>
>  The firewall project is a necessary function when the project is
> delivered. The lack of firewall function after switching OVN is not
> acceptable to customers. We intend to maintain this project and develop the
> fwaas driver based on ovn. Whether the neutron-fwaas project can be
> reactivate? What should I do ?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20211224/c18212ca/attachment.htm>


More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list