Open Stack

On 12/10/21 9:16 AM, Jean-Philippe Evrard wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2021, at 01:18, Ghanshyam Mann wrote:
>> Yes, those are the inconsistency we currently have in the Skyline 
>> project, but that is not what they will stick to. In Yoga PTG[1], the 
>> skyline team iterates through all these points and plans to
>> improve those and be consistent with the other OpenStack projects. They 
>> said they will
>> work on packaging, PTI, using Oslo code etc.
>>
>> Boxiang Zhu mentioned the same in the governance patch also[2].
> 
> The questions I have still stand: Do we need to be more lax in the governance to not _require_ to follow the PTI (and/or have an intention to follow through)? Can the TC make an exception?

IMO, we shouldn't allow an exception. Otherwise, it's going to become
super hard to contribute to OpenStack if every project is different. It
is a pandora box that should not be opened.

That being said, I don't think poetry is a problem for Debian anymore:
it's been packaged already. :)

Cheers,

Thomas Goirand (zigo)