[tc][all] Follow up pain point discussion
Ghanshyam Mann
gmann at ghanshyammann.com
Thu Dec 9 17:06:17 UTC 2021
---- On Thu, 09 Dec 2021 04:00:05 -0600 Thomas Goirand <zigo at debian.org> wrote ----
>
> Hi,
>
> I missed this thread and the discussion, though I've added to the etherpad:
>
> Glance
>
> FIX NEEDED - Glance doesn't work well over uwsgi, it's the only
> service with this state (appart from Swfit). We would need Glance to
> fully gate using uwsgi in the CI.
We run glance in uwsgi mode by default since wallaby [1] (GLANCE_STANDALONE=False means uwsgi)
and from this patch onwards[2], even import workflow is run in uwsgi by default in CI.
[1] https://github.com/openstack/devstack/blob/6c849e371384e468679d3d030fe494a36587c505/lib/glance#L85
[2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/742332
-gmann
>
> FIX NEEDED - Glance upload on Ceph is painfully slow. So much that
> many operators simply don't use the Ceph backend.
>
> Swift
>
> FIX NEEDED - Swift continues to use Eventlet. Switching to uwsgi
> increases performances dramatically. Switching to uwsgi is possible for
> swift-proxy, swift-container and swift-account, but it completely fails
> for swift-object. Swift needs to fully switch to uwsgi in the CI, and
> repair the swift-proxy to swift-object protocol to follow *real* http
> specifictions (at some point, swift-object drifted away from respecting
> http protocol, which makes it impossible to run it under uwsgi).
>
> I hope this helps,
> Cheers,
>
> Thomas Goirand (zigo)
>
> On 12/9/21 5:42 AM, Rico Lin wrote:
> > Dear all
> >
> > First, thank all who join us in the discussion or help on the etherpad [1]
> >
> > Here are wrap-ups of our first meeting yesterday:
> >
> > In the meeting, we have quick work through pain points for a couple of
> > projects: Cinder, Ironic, Neutron, QA, Horizon.
> > And put some action or tags(like `FIX NEEDED` or `INFO NEEDED`).
> > As for Nova, there is already have a good quality of replies and
> > actions, gmann will help with discussing tags with rest of Nova team.
> > Horizon team will go through the rest item in team meeting and finish
> > tagging after.
> > Also, TC picks the log level topic (check out log level discussion in
> > [2]) as one of the topics in next TC meeting.
> > So if you're interested, please check out [1] and kindly provide
> > your feedback.
> >
> > We plan to go through with other projects in our next pain point
> > meeting, which we expect to schedule around mid. of January.
> > Meanwhile, if teams can help with providing replies and tags will be
> > very helpful.
> >
> > As for possible cross-project pain points:
> > The OSC discussion went very well. The discussion includes OpenStack
> > Client and OpenStackSDK.
> > OSC seems to get more works done than the last time it was proposed as a
> > community goal (back in Train cycle?),
> > so TC has set up a topic in the next TC meeting to discuss the
> > possibility to set this as a community goal (for z or after-z cycles).
> >
> > RabbitMQ was discussed briefly but didn't have any specific suggestions
> > or actions. So if you have any, please kindly provide your feedback in
> > this ML or [3].
> >
> > If you would like to suggest other cross-project pain points, kindly
> > suggest in ML or [1] and help TCs to identify them.
> >
> >
> > Finally, we collect pain points and hope to get things fixed/improved,
> > so if you're interested to help with targeting any of the items in [1],
> > you're most welcome to reach out to project teams or at least provide
> > your feedback in [1].
> >
> > [1] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/pain-point-elimination
> > <https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/pain-point-elimination>
> > [2] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/pain-point-elimination#L261
> > <https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/pain-point-elimination#L261>
> > [3] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/pain-point-elimination#L21
> > <https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/pain-point-elimination#L21>
> >
> > *Rico Lin*
> > OIF Individual Board of directors, OpenStack TC, Multi-arch SIG chair,
> > Heat PTL,
> > Senior Software Engineer at EasyStack
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 4:39 PM Rico Lin <ricolin at ricolky.com
> > <mailto:ricolin at ricolky.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Dear all
> >
> > For pain point discussion,
> > Let's schedule the video meeting for *Dec. 8th, 15:00 UTC time*
> > Location: https://meet.google.com/xsx-inbw-mos
> > <https://meet.google.com/xsx-inbw-mos>
> >
> > *Rico Lin*
> > OIF Individual Board of directors, OpenStack TC, Multi-arch SIG
> > chair, Heat PTL,
> > Senior Software Engineer at EasyStack
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 5:37 PM Rico Lin <ricolin at ricolky.com
> > <mailto:ricolin at ricolky.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Dear all
> >
> > The pain point collection etherpad [1] seems to get good
> > attention from teams.
> > We plan to host a one-hour video meeting to keep the discussion
> > going.
> > Please fill in the doodle to select your preferred time if you
> > can join us:
> > https://doodle.com/poll/kur2mfywceerqcvh?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=link
> > <https://doodle.com/poll/kur2mfywceerqcvh?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=link>
> > The discussion will be hosted in video format.
> >
> > Here are some items (but not limited to) I expect we will
> > discuss and hopefully put some actions/efforts on.
> >
> > * General Pain point: RabbitMQ
> > * General Pain point: OpenStackClient support
> > * General project pain point discussion: How to encourage
> > teams to work/reply on pain points.
> >
> > Meanwhile, we encourage all to check the etherpad and provide
> > your feedback.
> > Also if teams can help to answer questions/concerns on etherpad
> > (like Nova team does) will be greatly appreciated.
> >
> > [1] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/pain-point-elimination
> > <https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/pain-point-elimination>
> >
> > *Rico Lin*
> >
>
>
>
More information about the openstack-discuss
mailing list