Open Stack

Hello,

Here is the patch[1] proposing the eol for pike, queen, rocky and stein
branches.

If anyone  wants to keep those branches, let us know.

[1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/820144/

Cheers,
Maysa.

On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 9:59 AM Michał Dulko <mdulko at redhat.com> wrote:

> Yes, let's remove them. It has little sense to keep these versions and
> we're actually actively working to keep the compatibility with older
> OpenStack versions anyway.
>
> On Fri, 2021-11-26 at 23:50 +0100, Maysa De Macedo Souza wrote:
> > Hello again,
> >
> > We also have Pike as a stable branch[0], so that is the older one,
> > which would also be EOL.
> >
> > [0]
> >
> https://review.opendev.org/q/(project:%255Eopenstack/kuryr.*)AND((branch:stable/queens)OR(branch:stable/rocky)OR(branch:stable/stein)OR(branch:stable/pike))
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Maysa.
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 11:42 PM Maysa De Macedo Souza
> > <mdemaced at redhat.com> wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > We have plenty of stable branches in Kuryr repositories still open
> > > with the oldest being stable/queens.
> > > We haven't seen many backports[0] proposed to Stein, Rocky and
> > > Queens, so I would like to propose retiring these branches.
> > >
> > > Let me know if anybody is interested in keeping any of those
> > > branches.
> > >
> > > [0]
> > >
> https://review.opendev.org/q/(project:%255Eopenstack/kuryr.*)AND((branch:stable/queens)OR(branch:stable/rocky)OR(branch:stable/stein))
> > >
> > > Thank you,
> > > Maysa Macedo.
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20211202/7c6f2d64/attachment.htm>