[cinder] high-priority reviews this week
Brian Rosmaita
rosmaita.fossdev at gmail.com
Thu Aug 26 12:22:31 UTC 2021
On 8/26/21 6:12 AM, Stephen Finucane wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-08-26 at 00:03 -0400, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
>> Hello Cinder team,
>>
>> As I mentioned at today's meeting, the cinderclient must be released
>> next week, and this means that any Xena cinder features that we want
>> supported in the Xena cinderclient need to merge into cinder first.
>> We've got two cinder patches that introduce new microversions, and thus
>> impact cinderclient. So please put the following patches at the top of
>> your reviewing list:
>
> I realize that this is not tied to a cinderclient release, but can I please ask
> that sqlalchemy-migrate -> alembic series [1] be included on this list also?
> Milestone 3 is very close and I will not be able to continue work on this next
> cycle. I'm also on holiday for two weeks starting September 6th. There are only
> 8 patches remaining so let's get this over the line while I'm still around and
> still have context.
I endorse this 100%. Let's get the cinderclient-related stuff and
Stephen's patches knocked out over the next two days, and move on to the
other features next week.
>
> Cheers,
> Stephen
>
> [1] https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%2522bp/remove-sqlalchemy-migrate%2522+status:open+project:openstack/cinder
>
>>
>> (1) "Snapshot in-use volumes without force flag"
>> cinder: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/789564
>> cinderclient: (simply requires bump in MAX_VERSION, will be done in the
>> release note patch)
>>
>> (2) "Expose volume & snapshot use_quota field"
>> cinder: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/786386
>> cinderclient:
>> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-cinderclient/+/787407
>> (very small patch)
>>
>> A slight complication is that 786386 is stacked on top of some other
>> patches. On the other hand, these are all nicely done and present
>> learning opportunities:
>>
>> - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/791240/ -- this is a
>> good one to review if you're interested in how the automated tests to
>> verify the request/response samples in the api-ref work
>>
>> - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/786383 -- relatively
>> small patch with great unit test coverage
>>
>> - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/786384/ -- this is a
>> good one if you want to get better acquainted with Cinder's use of Oslo
>> Versioned Objects
>>
>> - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/786385 -- this is
>> worth looking at to see the online data migration strategy Cinder uses
>> to enable rolling upgrades
>>
>> - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/786386 -- this is the
>> patch that introduces a new API microversion; it looks big, but a lot of
>> the files are sample requests/responses for the api-ref
>>
>>
>> Happy reviewing!
>>
>
>
More information about the openstack-discuss
mailing list